404 add reputation score api endpoint #410
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to two service files: Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/services/nft.service.ts (2)
28-31: Enhance error logging for community retrievalWhile the error handling is good, consider adding more context to the debug logs.
- logger.debug(community); + logger.debug('Retrieved community:', { communityId: dynamicNftModule?.community, community });
Line range hint
22-53: Consider breaking down the getReputationScore functionThe function is handling multiple responsibilities: token validation, community validation, profile retrieval, and score calculation. Consider breaking it down into smaller, focused functions for better maintainability.
Example structure:
async function validateTokenAndCommunity(tokenId: string): Promise<{module: IModule, community: ICommunity}>; async function getValidatedProfiles(address: string): Promise<Array<any>>; async function calculateTotalReputationScore(profiles: Array<any>, communityId: Types.ObjectId): Promise<number>;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/services/community.service.ts(2 hunks)src/services/nft.service.ts(5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/services/nft.service.ts (3)
3-3: LGTM: Import changes are appropriate
The new imports for ICommunity and communityService align with the added community-related functionality.
Also applies to: 12-12
115-119: LGTM: Error handling function is well-implemented
The function follows the established error handling pattern and includes proper typing and a clear error message.
Line range hint 22-22: Verify API route configuration
Ensure that the API route for this endpoint is properly configured in the routes directory.
✅ Verification successful
API route is properly configured and integrated
The API endpoint for reputation score is correctly set up with:
- Route defined at
GET /:tokenId/:address/reputation-score - Proper validation middleware in place
- Controller implementation with error handling (using catchAsync)
- Service integration for business logic
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for the API route configuration
echo "Searching for API route configuration..."
rg -l "getReputationScore" src/routes/
Length of output: 156
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the route implementation details
echo "Checking route implementation for getReputationScore..."
rg -A 5 "getReputationScore" src/routes/v1/nft.route.ts
Length of output: 285
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the complete route definition and validation
echo "Checking complete route definition..."
rg -B 5 "getReputationScore" src/routes/v1/nft.route.ts
# Check validation schema
echo -e "\nChecking validation schema..."
rg "getReputationScore" src/validations/
Length of output: 554
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the validation schema implementation
echo "Checking validation schema implementation..."
rg -A 5 "const getReputationScore = {" src/validations/nft.validation.ts
# Verify controller implementation exists
echo -e "\nVerifying controller implementation..."
rg "getReputationScore" src/controllers/
Length of output: 717
src/services/community.service.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM! Import addition is correct.
The FilterQuery type import from mongoose is properly added alongside other mongoose types.
42-42: Verify the impact of the type change across the codebase.
The type change from object to FilterQuery<ICommunity> improves type safety by ensuring the filter matches mongoose query capabilities. However, let's verify all callers of this function to ensure compatibility.
✅ Verification successful
Type change to FilterQuery<ICommunity> is safe and compatible with all usages
All active usages of getCommunityByFilter pass simple MongoDB query objects with _id field lookups, which are fully compatible with the FilterQuery<ICommunity> type. The commented-out calls in announcement.controller.ts also show valid filter patterns using _id and users fields that would be compatible with the new type.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all usages of getCommunityByFilter to verify type compatibility
# Search for direct function calls
echo "Direct function calls to getCommunityByFilter:"
rg "getCommunityByFilter\(" --type ts -B 2 -A 2
# Search for imported usage via communityService
echo -e "\nUsage through communityService:"
rg "communityService\.getCommunityByFilter\(" --type ts -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 8671
| reputationScore: reputationScore * 100, | ||
| communityName: community?.name, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Document score multiplication and consider type safety
- The multiplication by 100 needs documentation explaining its purpose.
- The return type should be explicitly defined.
Consider applying these changes:
+ interface ReputationScoreResponse {
+ reputationScore: number;
+ communityName: string | undefined;
+ }
- const getReputationScore = async (tokenId: string, address: string) => {
+ const getReputationScore = async (tokenId: string, address: string): Promise<ReputationScoreResponse> => {
// ... existing code ...
// Multiply by 100 to convert decimal score to percentage
return {
reputationScore: reputationScore * 100,
communityName: community?.name,
};Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements