Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated Readium version #55

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 20, 2023
Merged

Updated Readium version #55

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 20, 2023

Conversation

nunommts
Copy link
Contributor

What's this do?
This PR updates the app to support the latest version of Readium.

Why are we doing this? (w/ JIRA link if applicable)
There's a feature request to update the Readium version.

How should this be tested? / Do these changes have associated tests?
Follow the testing steps of this PR.

Dependencies for merging? Releasing to production?
This PR also needs to be merged

Have you updated the changelog?
Yes

Has the application documentation been updated for these changes?
No

Did someone actually run this code to verify it works?
Tested by @nunommts

@@ -67,8 +67,6 @@ dependencies {
implementation(libs.kotlinx.coroutines.android)
implementation(libs.kotlinx.coroutines.core.jvm)
implementation(libs.logback.android)
implementation(libs.nano.httpd)
implementation(libs.nano.httpd.nanolets)
implementation(libs.palace.theme)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉 🎉 🎉 🎉 🎉

Copy link
Contributor

@io7m io7m left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Glad to see this is all it took.

@nunommts nunommts merged commit 893c4c8 into main Nov 20, 2023
1 check passed
@nunommts nunommts deleted the feature/update-readium-version branch November 20, 2023 15:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants