Improve performance for transitive dependency checks

[To6i]

TransitiveDependencyCondition internally calls contains() recursively on the collection of all objects to be tested. If this collection is a large list and there are enough recursive calls to getDirectDependencyTargetsOutsideOfAnalyzedClasses() this results in a heavy performance impact. On a reasonable large project a single test using that condition may take minutes to complete.

Here is a 30 seconds FlameGraph taken while an transitive check was running for > 2 minutes:

Based on the samples, the CPU hangs in this filter lamdba for > 86% of the time:

• TransitiveDependencyCondition$$Lambda$553.0x000000080121ca88:::test (47,247,323 samples, 0.03%)
• TransitiveDependencyCondition$$Lambda$553.0x000000080121ca88:::test (44,447,761 samples, 0.03%)
• TransitiveDependencyCondition$$Lambda$553.0x000000080121ca88:::test (10,837,882,731 samples, 7.32%)
• TransitiveDependencyCondition$$Lambda$553.0x000000080121ca88:::test (13,262,127,759 samples, 8.96%)
• TransitiveDependencyCondition$$Lambda$553.0x000000080121ca88:::test (12,668,650,362 samples, 8.56%)
• TransitiveDependencyCondition$$Lambda$553.0x000000080121ca88:::test (15,368,403,186 samples, 10.38%)
• TransitiveDependencyCondition$$Lambda$553.0x000000080121ca88:::test (46,224,364 samples, 0.03%)
• TransitiveDependencyCondition$$Lambda$553.0x000000080121ca88:::test (47,314,101 samples, 0.03%)
• TransitiveDependencyCondition$$Lambda$553.0x000000080121ca88:::test (18,048,208,277 samples, 12.19%)
• TransitiveDependencyCondition$$Lambda$553.0x000000080121ca88:::test (13,405,921,387 samples, 9.06%)
• TransitiveDependencyCondition$$Lambda$553.0x000000080121ca88:::test (93,152,524 samples, 0.06%)
• TransitiveDependencyCondition$$Lambda$553.0x000000080121ca88:::test (3,244,023,882 samples, 2.19%)
• TransitiveDependencyCondition$$Lambda$553.0x000000080121ca88:::test (919,865,902 samples, 0.62%)
• TransitiveDependencyCondition$$Lambda$553.0x000000080121ca88:::test (6,438,577,874 samples, 4.35%)
• TransitiveDependencyCondition$$Lambda$553.0x000000080121ca88:::test (6,760,263,856 samples, 4.57%)
• TransitiveDependencyCondition$$Lambda$553.0x000000080121ca88:::test (7,031,313,250 samples, 4.75%)
• TransitiveDependencyCondition$$Lambda$553.0x000000080121ca88:::test (7,723,048,585 samples, 5.22%)
• TransitiveDependencyCondition$$Lambda$553.0x000000080121ca88:::test (11,918,050,716 samples, 8.05%)
• TransitiveDependencyCondition$$Lambda$553.0x000000080121ca88:::test (46,026,822 samples, 0.03%)

So, converting the given list to a Set with much better contains() performance fixes this issue.