[BugFix] Remove query sync mv read lock (backport #52239)

[mergify]

Why I'm doing:

• lock has been done in analyze phase, no need to lock again.

        // 1. For all queries, we need db lock when analyze phase
        PlannerMetaLocker plannerMetaLocker = new PlannerMetaLocker(session, stmt);
        try (var guard = session.bindScope()) {
            // Analyze
            analyzeStatement(stmt, session, plannerMetaLocker);

What I'm doing:

• Remove query sync mv read lock

Fixes #issue

What type of PR is this:

• BugFix
• Feature
• Enhancement
• Refactor
• UT
• Doc
• Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

• Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
• No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

• Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
• Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
• Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
• Feature removed
• Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

• I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
• This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
  • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
• This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

• I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
  • 3.3
  • 3.2
  • 3.1
  • 3.0
  • 2.5

---

This is an automatic backport of pull request #52239 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). ## Why I'm doing: - lock has been done in analyze phase, no need to lock again. ``` // 1. For all queries, we need db lock when analyze phase PlannerMetaLocker plannerMetaLocker = new PlannerMetaLocker(session, stmt); try (var guard = session.bindScope()) { // Analyze analyzeStatement(stmt, session, plannerMetaLocker); ``` ## What I'm doing: - Remove query sync mv read lock

Fixes #issue

What type of PR is this:

• BugFix
• Feature
• Enhancement
• Refactor
• UT
• Doc
• Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

• Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
• No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

• Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
• Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
• Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
• Feature removed
• Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

• I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
• This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
  • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
• This is a backport pr

[mergify]

Cherry-pick of 77ecc91 has failed:

On branch mergify/bp/branch-3.3/pr-52239
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/branch-3.3'.

You are currently cherry-picking commit 77ecc912fd.
  (fix conflicts and run "git cherry-pick --continue")
  (use "git cherry-pick --skip" to skip this patch)
  (use "git cherry-pick --abort" to cancel the cherry-pick operation)

Unmerged paths:
  (use "git add <file>..." to mark resolution)
	both modified:   fe/fe-core/src/main/java/com/starrocks/sql/analyzer/QueryAnalyzer.java

no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")

To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally

[mergify]

@mergify[bot]: Backport conflict, please reslove the conflict and resubmit the pr

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud