[BugFix] Capture resource group for scan task (backport #51121)

[mergify]

Why I'm doing:

The scan task queue is a two-level queue:

• First level: The workgroup_entity queue, which stores raw pointers to workgroup_entity. These workgroup_entities are owned by their workgroups.
• Second level: The task queue, where each workgroup_entity contains an internal task queue. Each task within this queue also has a raw pointer to the associated workgroup.

When retrieving a task from the scan task queue, the process first accesses the workgroup_entity and then extracts a task from the internal task queue of that workgroup_entity.

However, the lifecycle of a scan task can be longer than that of the corresponding pipeline driver and workgroup. When executing the SQL command DROP RESOURCE GROUP, the workgroup is deleted once all associated pipeline drivers have completed.

This can lead to a situation where the workgroup_entity and its corresponding tasks still reside in the scan task queue, but the workgroup itself has already been released. In such cases, accessing the workgroup_entity results in a "use-after-free" error.

*** Aborted at 1726628109 (unix time) try "date -d @1726628109" if you are using GNU date ***
PC: @            0x5620204 starrocks: :workgroup: :WorkGroupScanTaskQueue::take ()
*** SIGSEGV (@0x0) received by PID 97 (TID 0x7fbd3fe57640) from PID 0; stack trace: ***
    @       0x7fbea0d28ee8 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x99ee7)
    @           0x9eb6839 google::anonymous::FailureSignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*)
    @       0x7fbea@cd1520 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x4251f)
    @           0x5620204 starrocks::workgroup::WorkGroupScanTaskQueue::take()
    @           0x578b230 starrocks::workgroup::ScanExecutor::worker_thread()
    @           0x88e01e4 starrocks::ThreadPool::dispatch_thread()
    @           0x88d95b9 starrocks::Thread::supervise_thread(void*)
    @       0x7fbea0d23ac3 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x94ac2)
    @       0x7fbea0db4a04 clone

What I'm doing:

To prevent this issue, each task should hold a shared pointer to the workgroup. This ensures that the workgroup will not be deleted as long as there are tasks in the scan task queue referencing it.

Fixes #issue

What type of PR is this:

• BugFix
• Feature
• Enhancement
• Refactor
• UT
• Doc
• Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

• Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
• No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

• Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
• Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
• Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
• Feature removed
• Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

• I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
• This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
  • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
• This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

• I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
  • 3.3
  • 3.2
  • 3.1
  • 3.0
  • 2.5

---

This is an automatic backport of pull request #51121 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). ## Why I'm doing: The scan task queue is a two-level queue: - **First level**: The `workgroup_entity` queue, which stores raw pointers to `workgroup_entity`. These `workgroup_entities` are owned by their workgroups. - **Second level**: The task queue, where each `workgroup_entity` contains an internal task queue. Each task within this queue also has a raw pointer to the associated workgroup.

When retrieving a task from the scan task queue, the process first accesses the workgroup_entity and then extracts a task from the internal task queue of that workgroup_entity.

However, the lifecycle of a scan task can be longer than that of the corresponding pipeline driver and workgroup. When executing the SQL command DROP RESOURCE GROUP, the workgroup is deleted once all associated pipeline drivers have completed.

This can lead to a situation where the workgroup_entity and its corresponding tasks still reside in the scan task queue, but the workgroup itself has already been released. In such cases, accessing the workgroup_entity results in a "use-after-free" error.

*** Aborted at 1726628109 (unix time) try "date -d @1726628109" if you are using GNU date ***
PC: @            0x5620204 starrocks: :workgroup: :WorkGroupScanTaskQueue::take ()
*** SIGSEGV (@0x0) received by PID 97 (TID 0x7fbd3fe57640) from PID 0; stack trace: ***
    @       0x7fbea0d28ee8 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x99ee7)
    @           0x9eb6839 google::anonymous::FailureSignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*)
    @       0x7fbea@cd1520 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x4251f)
    @           0x5620204 starrocks::workgroup::WorkGroupScanTaskQueue::take()
    @           0x578b230 starrocks::workgroup::ScanExecutor::worker_thread()
    @           0x88e01e4 starrocks::ThreadPool::dispatch_thread()
    @           0x88d95b9 starrocks::Thread::supervise_thread(void*)
    @       0x7fbea0d23ac3 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x94ac2)
    @       0x7fbea0db4a04 clone

What I'm doing:

To prevent this issue, each task should hold a shared pointer to the workgroup. This ensures that the workgroup will not be deleted as long as there are tasks in the scan task queue referencing it.

Fixes #issue

What type of PR is this:

• BugFix
• Feature
• Enhancement
• Refactor
• UT
• Doc
• Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

• Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
• No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

• Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
• Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
• Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
• Feature removed
• Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

• I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
• This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
  • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
• This is a backport pr

[mergify]

Cherry-pick of 3317f49 has failed:

On branch mergify/bp/branch-2.5/pr-51121
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/branch-2.5'.

You are currently cherry-picking commit 3317f49811.
  (fix conflicts and run "git cherry-pick --continue")
  (use "git cherry-pick --skip" to skip this patch)
  (use "git cherry-pick --abort" to cancel the cherry-pick operation)

Changes to be committed:
	modified:   be/src/exec/pipeline/scan/scan_operator.cpp

Unmerged paths:
  (use "git add/rm <file>..." as appropriate to mark resolution)
	deleted by us:   be/src/exec/pipeline/exchange/mem_limited_chunk_queue.cpp
	deleted by us:   be/src/exec/pipeline/hashjoin/spillable_hash_join_probe_operator.cpp
	deleted by us:   be/src/exec/spill/executor.h
	deleted by us:   be/src/exec/spill/spiller.hpp
	both modified:   be/src/exec/workgroup/scan_task_queue.cpp
	both modified:   be/src/exec/workgroup/scan_task_queue.h
	both modified:   be/src/udf/java/utils.cpp

To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally

[mergify]

@mergify[bot]: Backport conflict, please reslove the conflict and resubmit the pr