Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BugFix] add return type check in Java UDTF (backport #50615) #50640

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2024

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Why I'm doing:

*** SIGSEGV (@0x228) received by PID 1463834 (TID 0x7f75201bc640) from PID 552; stack trace: ***
    @     0x7f767c211ee8 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x99ee7)
    @          0xc55e3a9 google::(anonymous namespace)::FailureSignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*)
    @     0x7f767cee101d os::Linux::chained_handler(int, siginfo_t*, void*)
    @     0x7f767cee5d49 JVM_handle_linux_signal
    @     0x7f767ced91f8 signalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*)
    @     0x7f767c1ba520 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x4251f)
    @     0x7f767ccb7924 jni_invoke_nonstatic(JNIEnv_*, JavaValue*, _jobject*, JNICallType, _jmethodID*, JNI_ArgumentPusher*, Thread*) [clone .constprop.233]
    @     0x7f767ccc1579 jni_CallLongMethodV
    @          0x56d9f6f JNIEnv_::CallLongMethod(_jobject*, _jmethodID*, ...)
    @          0x8a30313 starrocks::append_jvalue(starrocks::MethodTypeDescriptor, starrocks::Column*, jvalue)
    @          0x78c5cbd starrocks::JavaUDTFFunction::process(starrocks::RuntimeState*, starrocks::TableFunctionState*) const
    @          0x5b2514e starrocks::pipeline::TableFunctionOperator::_process_table_function(starrocks::RuntimeState*)
    @          0x5b266ea starrocks::pipeline::TableFunctionOperator::pull_chunk(starrocks::RuntimeState*)
    @          0x5abff76 starrocks::pipeline::PipelineDriver::process(starrocks::RuntimeState*, int)
    @          0x5aad0db starrocks::pipeline::GlobalDriverExecutor::_worker_thread()
    @          0x8b62fd4 starrocks::ThreadPool::dispatch_thread()
    @          0x8b5c0f9 starrocks::Thread::supervise_thread(void*)
    @     0x7f767c20cac3 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x94ac2)
    @     0x7f767c29e850 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x12684f)

What I'm doing:

Fixes #issue

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
  • This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

  • I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
    • 3.3
    • 3.2
    • 3.1
    • 3.0
    • 2.5

This is an automatic backport of pull request #50615 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). ## Why I'm doing:
*** SIGSEGV (@0x228) received by PID 1463834 (TID 0x7f75201bc640) from PID 552; stack trace: ***
    @     0x7f767c211ee8 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x99ee7)
    @          0xc55e3a9 google::(anonymous namespace)::FailureSignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*)
    @     0x7f767cee101d os::Linux::chained_handler(int, siginfo_t*, void*)
    @     0x7f767cee5d49 JVM_handle_linux_signal
    @     0x7f767ced91f8 signalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*)
    @     0x7f767c1ba520 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x4251f)
    @     0x7f767ccb7924 jni_invoke_nonstatic(JNIEnv_*, JavaValue*, _jobject*, JNICallType, _jmethodID*, JNI_ArgumentPusher*, Thread*) [clone .constprop.233]
    @     0x7f767ccc1579 jni_CallLongMethodV
    @          0x56d9f6f JNIEnv_::CallLongMethod(_jobject*, _jmethodID*, ...)
    @          0x8a30313 starrocks::append_jvalue(starrocks::MethodTypeDescriptor, starrocks::Column*, jvalue)
    @          0x78c5cbd starrocks::JavaUDTFFunction::process(starrocks::RuntimeState*, starrocks::TableFunctionState*) const
    @          0x5b2514e starrocks::pipeline::TableFunctionOperator::_process_table_function(starrocks::RuntimeState*)
    @          0x5b266ea starrocks::pipeline::TableFunctionOperator::pull_chunk(starrocks::RuntimeState*)
    @          0x5abff76 starrocks::pipeline::PipelineDriver::process(starrocks::RuntimeState*, int)
    @          0x5aad0db starrocks::pipeline::GlobalDriverExecutor::_worker_thread()
    @          0x8b62fd4 starrocks::ThreadPool::dispatch_thread()
    @          0x8b5c0f9 starrocks::Thread::supervise_thread(void*)
    @     0x7f767c20cac3 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x94ac2)
    @     0x7f767c29e850 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x12684f)

What I'm doing:

Fixes #issue

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
  • This is a backport pr

Signed-off-by: stdpain <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit f147df2)
@wanpengfei-git wanpengfei-git merged commit 7ebcc77 into branch-3.1 Sep 4, 2024
34 of 35 checks passed
@wanpengfei-git wanpengfei-git deleted the mergify/bp/branch-3.1/pr-50615 branch September 4, 2024 02:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants