Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: readme enhanced #117

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Apr 19, 2024
Merged

feat: readme enhanced #117

merged 15 commits into from
Apr 19, 2024

Conversation

maehr
Copy link
Member

@maehr maehr commented Mar 9, 2024

Pull request

Proposed changes

Types of changes

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
  • Enhancement (non-breaking change which enhances functionality)
  • Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change).

Checklist

  • I have read the README document.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Enhanced the README with an overview of the Stadt.Geschichte.Basel project, key features, and contributors.
    • Updated installation instructions to include content download from hypotheses.org.
    • Added links to related platforms and badges for Lighthouse scores.
    • Improved clarity in the support section.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Mar 9, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: ba05e9b

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The update to the README.md file in the Stadt.Geschichte.Basel project enriches the document with a comprehensive overview, including the project's scope, key features, and contributors. It also integrates essential updates to the installation instructions and optimizes the production build process, enhancing clarity and functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Added project overview, key features, contributors, and badges. Updated installation instructions and production build optimizations. Minor edits in the support section.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Revision of README (#21)

🐇✨
A hop, a skip, a code deploy,
In Basel's tales, we find our joy.
README revamped, with badges bright,
Now clearer paths lead through the night.
A rabbit's work, with care, we craft,
In digital halls, where history's draft. 🌟
🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the docs label Mar 9, 2024
@maehr maehr requested review from koilebeit and mtwente March 9, 2024 21:54
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 2

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e3a82df and b49f16d.
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • assets/images/pagespeed-insights.svg is excluded by: !**/*.svg
Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 6
README.md (6)
  • 10-14: The addition of Lighthouse score badges is a great way to visually represent the project's performance metrics. Ensure that the paths to the badge images are correct and that the images are accessible in the repository.
  • 26-31: The Key Features section succinctly highlights the unique aspects of the project. Ensure that the features listed are up-to-date and accurately reflect the project's current state. Also, consider addressing the possible spelling mistake found in the context of WCAG standards.
  • 32-32: The Lighthouse Score badge is a nice addition, but ensure that the image path is correct and that the image is accessible in the repository. Also, consider if this badge overlaps with the individual Lighthouse score badges added earlier.
  • 53-65: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [36-70]

The Installation, Usage, and Development sections provide clear instructions for setting up and maintaining the project. Ensure that all commands are accurate and that the external links are valid. Additionally, address the possible spelling mistake found in the context of "pnpm" and consider if it's a false positive given "pnpm" is a valid package manager.

  • 98-100: The Authors and acknowledgment section has been updated to include a new contributor. Ensure that the names and links are correct. Additionally, consider verifying the spelling of names against possible false positives from the static analysis.
  • 7-36: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [106-106]

The License section correctly specifies the project's license. Ensure that the link to the LICENSE.md file is valid and accessible.

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b49f16d and cc265b4.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 7
README.md (7)
  • 20-26: The Key Features section succinctly highlights the unique aspects of the project. To further improve this section:
  • Ensure the spelling and terminology are consistent with industry standards, especially for technical terms like "WCAG."
  • Consider adding more descriptive text for the Lighthouse Score badge to explain its significance and how it reflects on the project's quality.
  • 33-39: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [30-36]

In the Installation section, the command pnpm install is correctly specified. However, ensure that the spelling of "pnpm" and other technical terms is consistent throughout the document. Additionally, consider explaining briefly what pnpm is for readers who might not be familiar with it.

  • 47-59: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [36-56]

The Usage section provides clear instructions for running the development server and building for production. To enhance clarity and maintainability:

  • Verify the spelling of external resources and commands.
  • Consider adding a brief explanation of what each command does, especially for users who might be new to the project or to development in general.
  • 7-30: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [64-64]

In the Development section, the instructions for code checking and formatting are straightforward. To improve:

  • Ensure the spelling of commands and tools is accurate.
  • Consider adding a brief description of the purpose of each command, helping new contributors understand their importance.
  • 7-30: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [75-80]

The Support section is well-organized, providing clear channels for different types of inquiries. To refine:

  • Address any typographical issues, such as repeated whitespaces, to enhance the document's professionalism.
  • Ensure that all links are up-to-date and accessible to facilitate community engagement.
  • 92-94: In the Authors and acknowledgment section, the contributors are appropriately credited. To further refine:
  • Verify the spelling of names and links to ensure accuracy.
  • Consider adding a brief description of each contributor's role or contribution to the project, fostering a sense of community and recognition.
  • 7-30: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [100-100]

The License section correctly specifies the project's license. To improve:

  • Ensure the spelling and terminology are accurate, especially for legal terms.
  • Consider linking directly to the official GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 documentation for clarity and ease of access.

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@mtwente mtwente left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we could also add a short sentence about the institutional context of the research project. This readme now describes not only the portal source code but the whole research project with all of the books, but just mentions three people.

Apart from that, I made a few suggestions on wording changes and fixed a few typos.

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
maehr and others added 4 commits March 10, 2024 00:55
Co-authored-by: Moritz Twente <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Moritz Twente <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Moritz Twente <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Moritz Twente <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 2

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cc265b4 and 2476023.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 3
README.md (3)
  • 12-19: The Overview section provides a comprehensive introduction to the Stadt.Geschichte.Basel project. However, ensure that all external links, such as those to stadtgeschichtebasel.ch, kit.svelte.dev, pages.cloudflare.com, sgb.hypotheses.org, and agendabasel.ch, are kept up-to-date and functional to maintain the document's usefulness.
  • 20-26: The Key Features section succinctly highlights the project's unique aspects. Consider adding more features if applicable, to give readers a broader understanding of the project's capabilities. Also, ensure the Lighthouse Score badge's link points to the current and accurate performance metrics.
  • 94-94: In the Authors and acknowledgment section, a new contributor, Moritz Twente, has been added. Ensure that all contributors are acknowledged appropriately and that their contributions are accurately represented. Additionally, verify the GitHub profile links for correctness and accessibility.

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2476023 and a50848d.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 4
README.md (4)
  • 10-18: The addition of the Overview section provides a comprehensive introduction to the project, effectively summarizing its goals, scope, and the resources it offers. This enhances the document's clarity and utility for readers. However, consider adding a brief mention of the command pnpm run prebuild as highlighted in issue Revision of README #21, ensuring it's easily noticeable for users setting up the project.
  • 20-26: The Key Features section clearly outlines the unique aspects of the project, such as its fast static website, interactive features, and accessibility-focused design. Including a Lighthouse score badge is a great way to visually communicate the project's performance. Ensure the image link to the Lighthouse score is correct and accessible.
  • 36-36: It's good to see the inclusion of the pnpm run prebuild command in the Installation section, directly addressing issue Revision of README #21. This ensures users are aware of the necessary steps to properly set up the project. Make sure to explain what the prebuild script does for clarity.
  • 94-94: Adding Moritz Twente to the Authors and acknowledgment section is a nice touch to acknowledge contributions. Ensure all contributor links are valid and lead to the correct GitHub profiles.
Verification successful

The verification process has successfully confirmed that the GitHub profile link for Moritz Twente (https://github.com/mtwente) is valid, as indicated by the HTTP/2 200 response status. This means the link leads to an existing GitHub profile, aligning with the review comment's suggestion to ensure all contributor links are valid and lead to the correct GitHub profiles.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the validity of the GitHub profile link for Moritz Twente.
curl --head https://github.com/mtwente | grep "200 OK"

Length of output: 452



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the validity of the GitHub profile link for Moritz Twente with a broader check.
curl -sI https://github.com/mtwente | grep -E "HTTP/2 200|HTTP/1.1 200 OK"

Length of output: 88

@maehr maehr requested review from koilebeit and removed request for koilebeit April 11, 2024 13:11
@maehr maehr requested a review from mtwente April 19, 2024 14:44
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
maehr and others added 3 commits April 19, 2024 16:53
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@maehr maehr merged commit 942fee7 into Stadt-Geschichte-Basel:main Apr 19, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Revision of README
3 participants