-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: readme enhanced #117
Conversation
|
WalkthroughThe update to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
assets/images/pagespeed-insights.svg
is excluded by:!**/*.svg
Files selected for processing (1)
- README.md (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 6
README.md (6)
- 10-14: The addition of Lighthouse score badges is a great way to visually represent the project's performance metrics. Ensure that the paths to the badge images are correct and that the images are accessible in the repository.
- 26-31: The Key Features section succinctly highlights the unique aspects of the project. Ensure that the features listed are up-to-date and accurately reflect the project's current state. Also, consider addressing the possible spelling mistake found in the context of WCAG standards.
- 32-32: The Lighthouse Score badge is a nice addition, but ensure that the image path is correct and that the image is accessible in the repository. Also, consider if this badge overlaps with the individual Lighthouse score badges added earlier.
- 53-65: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [36-70]
The Installation, Usage, and Development sections provide clear instructions for setting up and maintaining the project. Ensure that all commands are accurate and that the external links are valid. Additionally, address the possible spelling mistake found in the context of "pnpm" and consider if it's a false positive given "pnpm" is a valid package manager.
- 98-100: The Authors and acknowledgment section has been updated to include a new contributor. Ensure that the names and links are correct. Additionally, consider verifying the spelling of names against possible false positives from the static analysis.
- 7-36: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [106-106]
The License section correctly specifies the project's license. Ensure that the link to the LICENSE.md file is valid and accessible.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- README.md (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 7
README.md (7)
- 20-26: The Key Features section succinctly highlights the unique aspects of the project. To further improve this section:
- Ensure the spelling and terminology are consistent with industry standards, especially for technical terms like "WCAG."
- Consider adding more descriptive text for the Lighthouse Score badge to explain its significance and how it reflects on the project's quality.
- 33-39: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [30-36]
In the Installation section, the command
pnpm install
is correctly specified. However, ensure that the spelling of "pnpm" and other technical terms is consistent throughout the document. Additionally, consider explaining briefly whatpnpm
is for readers who might not be familiar with it.
- 47-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [36-56]
The Usage section provides clear instructions for running the development server and building for production. To enhance clarity and maintainability:
- Verify the spelling of external resources and commands.
- Consider adding a brief explanation of what each command does, especially for users who might be new to the project or to development in general.
- 7-30: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [64-64]
In the Development section, the instructions for code checking and formatting are straightforward. To improve:
- Ensure the spelling of commands and tools is accurate.
- Consider adding a brief description of the purpose of each command, helping new contributors understand their importance.
- 7-30: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [75-80]
The Support section is well-organized, providing clear channels for different types of inquiries. To refine:
- Address any typographical issues, such as repeated whitespaces, to enhance the document's professionalism.
- Ensure that all links are up-to-date and accessible to facilitate community engagement.
- 92-94: In the Authors and acknowledgment section, the contributors are appropriately credited. To further refine:
- Verify the spelling of names and links to ensure accuracy.
- Consider adding a brief description of each contributor's role or contribution to the project, fostering a sense of community and recognition.
- 7-30: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [100-100]
The License section correctly specifies the project's license. To improve:
- Ensure the spelling and terminology are accurate, especially for legal terms.
- Consider linking directly to the official GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 documentation for clarity and ease of access.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe we could also add a short sentence about the institutional context of the research project. This readme now describes not only the portal source code but the whole research project with all of the books, but just mentions three people.
Apart from that, I made a few suggestions on wording changes and fixed a few typos.
Co-authored-by: Moritz Twente <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Moritz Twente <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Moritz Twente <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Moritz Twente <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- README.md (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 3
README.md (3)
- 12-19: The Overview section provides a comprehensive introduction to the Stadt.Geschichte.Basel project. However, ensure that all external links, such as those to
stadtgeschichtebasel.ch
,kit.svelte.dev
,pages.cloudflare.com
,sgb.hypotheses.org
, andagendabasel.ch
, are kept up-to-date and functional to maintain the document's usefulness.- 20-26: The Key Features section succinctly highlights the project's unique aspects. Consider adding more features if applicable, to give readers a broader understanding of the project's capabilities. Also, ensure the Lighthouse Score badge's link points to the current and accurate performance metrics.
- 94-94: In the Authors and acknowledgment section, a new contributor, Moritz Twente, has been added. Ensure that all contributors are acknowledged appropriately and that their contributions are accurately represented. Additionally, verify the GitHub profile links for correctness and accessibility.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- README.md (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 4
README.md (4)
- 10-18: The addition of the Overview section provides a comprehensive introduction to the project, effectively summarizing its goals, scope, and the resources it offers. This enhances the document's clarity and utility for readers. However, consider adding a brief mention of the command
pnpm run prebuild
as highlighted in issue Revision of README #21, ensuring it's easily noticeable for users setting up the project.- 20-26: The Key Features section clearly outlines the unique aspects of the project, such as its fast static website, interactive features, and accessibility-focused design. Including a Lighthouse score badge is a great way to visually communicate the project's performance. Ensure the image link to the Lighthouse score is correct and accessible.
- 36-36: It's good to see the inclusion of the
pnpm run prebuild
command in the Installation section, directly addressing issue Revision of README #21. This ensures users are aware of the necessary steps to properly set up the project. Make sure to explain what the prebuild script does for clarity.- 94-94: Adding Moritz Twente to the Authors and acknowledgment section is a nice touch to acknowledge contributions. Ensure all contributor links are valid and lead to the correct GitHub profiles.
Verification successful
The verification process has successfully confirmed that the GitHub profile link for Moritz Twente (
https://github.com/mtwente
) is valid, as indicated by the HTTP/2 200 response status. This means the link leads to an existing GitHub profile, aligning with the review comment's suggestion to ensure all contributor links are valid and lead to the correct GitHub profiles.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the validity of the GitHub profile link for Moritz Twente. curl --head https://github.com/mtwente | grep "200 OK"Length of output: 452
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the validity of the GitHub profile link for Moritz Twente with a broader check. curl -sI https://github.com/mtwente | grep -E "HTTP/2 200|HTTP/1.1 200 OK"Length of output: 88
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Pull request
Proposed changes
Types of changes
Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit