Fix: Switching between multi-extruder printers using tabs can cause t… #7483
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reproduction steps for the issue:
you can observe that only one tool remains. Moreover, for multi-tool machines, Orca no longer allows the addition or removal of filament buttons (default). This can be very confusing for users.
Analysis:
. This inconsistency can lead to confusion and errors in the user interface, such as the addition or removal of filament buttons not being available for multi-tool machines, which will be perplexing.
To address this issue and align with the characteristics of printers like Prusa and Snapmaker, it is recommended to standardize the determination of extruder_count by using nozzle_diameter for parsing across the software. This approach would ensure a unified method for identifying the number of extruders, thereby reducing confusion and improving the user experience.
In multi-tool scenarios, modify the parameters passed to on_filaments_change.
prevent crashing