Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FIX] account_invoice_triple_discount: restore original discount field's precision by using change_digit function #1

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 12.0-fix-account_invoice_triple_discount-subtotal_computation
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tafaRU
Copy link

@tafaRU tafaRU commented Aug 2, 2021

Use change_digit function to restore original discount field's precision in order to avoid to have always (16, 10) as precision in case of any errors.

@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ def triple_discount_preprocess(self):
# more digits than allowed from field's precision,
# so let's increase it just for saving it correctly in cache
discount_field = self._fields['discount']
discount_original_digits = discount_field._digits
discount_original_digits = dp.get_precision("Discount")(self.env.cr)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you can avoid this variable discount_original_digits... just assign dp.get_precision("Discount")(self.env.cr) in

discount_field._digits = discount_original_digits

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done, thanks!

…ion in order to avoid to have always (16, 10) as precision in case of any errors.
@tafaRU tafaRU force-pushed the 12.0-fix-account_invoice_triple_discount-subtotal_computation_digits branch from 475829f to 8aa2657 Compare August 3, 2021 15:45
Copy link
Owner

@SimoRubi SimoRubi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add a test case for the errors you mentioned in the PR description?

I don't see how previous code could fail more than the one you are proposing here

@@ -100,7 +99,7 @@ def triple_discount_preprocess(self):
})

# Restore discount field's precision
discount_field._digits = discount_original_digits
discount_field._digits = dp.get_precision("Discount")(self.env.cr)
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here you are hardcoding 'Discount' precision for the field while previous code restored the original precision of the field.

How is this taking care of errors more than previous code?

@tafaRU
Copy link
Author

tafaRU commented Mar 2, 2022

@SimoRubi have you seen SimoRubi/sale-workflow#1 (comment) ?

@SimoRubi
Copy link
Owner

SimoRubi commented Mar 3, 2022

@SimoRubi have you seen SimoRubi/sale-workflow#1 (comment) ?

yes, but I don't think that changes the status of that PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants