Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add dependency license check for /website. #1321

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 27, 2024

Conversation

Jonas-Sander
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The update introduces a new job in the GitHub workflow aimed at ensuring compliance with licensing requirements for the website. By utilizing Flutter commands and lic_ck, licenses are checked automatically, enhancing the process of verifying licenses. This addition underscores the commitment to maintaining legal integrity and software quality by systematically checking for license adherence.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/licence.yml Added a job to check licenses in the website by running Flutter commands and checking licenses using lic_ck.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Note: Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository by the repository owner. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your comments unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Comment on lines +68 to +72
- name: Check licenses in website
run: |
cd website
flutter pub get
lic_ck check-licenses --config ../licenses_config.yaml --problematic
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The addition of the job to check licenses in the /website directory is a positive step towards ensuring compliance with acceptable license agreements. However, there are a few recommendations to enhance this job:

  1. Error Handling: Consider adding error handling for the commands within the job. This could involve checking the exit status of commands like flutter pub get and lic_ck check-licenses to ensure they execute successfully. If an error occurs, the job should fail gracefully, providing clear error messages to help diagnose issues.

  2. Documentation: It might be beneficial to add comments within the workflow file explaining the purpose of each step, especially for the lic_ck check-licenses command. This will make the workflow more understandable to new contributors or team members unfamiliar with the lic_ck tool.

  3. Performance Optimization: If the license checking process is time-consuming, consider caching the Flutter dependencies using GitHub Actions' caching mechanism. This can significantly reduce the time taken to run the job on subsequent executions by reusing the previously fetched dependencies.

  4. Security: Ensure that the version of lic_ck and other tools used are up-to-date to mitigate potential security vulnerabilities. Regularly updating these tools can help in maintaining the security posture of the project.

Copy link
Member

@nilsreichardt nilsreichardt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Jonas-Sander Jonas-Sander added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 27, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 336e006 Feb 27, 2024
27 checks passed
@Jonas-Sander Jonas-Sander deleted the add-website-licenses-check branch February 27, 2024 06:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants