-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Completes the remainder of the code quality work #179
Completes the remainder of the code quality work #179
Conversation
07a3ab2
to
1acf396
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please see trexfeathers/SciTools.github#16
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please see trexfeathers/SciTools.github#17
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please see trexfeathers/SciTools.github#18
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please see SciTools/.github#50
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please see SciTools/.github#51
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please see SciTools/.github#52
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, but I think you can get rid of these ignore
entries from [tool.repo-review]
now (GH212, PC170 and PC901):
(Sorry for the link, but GitHub won't let me apply comments to lines you have not modified in your PR in the review)
Also, is there a reason you didn't add the filterwarnings=["error"]
to the pytest ini?
It's currently an sp-repo-review suggestion (PP309) that you have in your ignore list.
Evidently, that's why haha. I'll leave it out of this PR, and investigate later. |
Fair enough! It seems to be panicking over on the Warning, which is odd as the error level was set to "error"... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking good. LGTM 🚀
I have closed all the relevant issues; this pull request just further aligns to the templates, rather than changing them.
Resolves most of #155, save for filterwarnings (#177).
Closes #174.