Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adds Coevolve aggregator to the Jumps benchmark suite #565

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jan 19, 2023

Conversation

gzagatti
Copy link
Contributor

This PR adds the new Coevolve aggregator (added in PR SciML/JumpProcesses.jl#276) to the Jumps benchmark suite.

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Does this method make sense in these benchmarks? Since it's all constant rates, it's just going to have overhead compared to the other techniques? Is this just to measure that overhead?

@gzagatti
Copy link
Contributor Author

The benchmark is to measure the overhead. When passed constant rates, Coevolve should obtain a performance very close to NRM since the algorithm reduces to the latter.

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

The benchmarking machine had a hard drive failure. Remind me to make this rerun after the hardware is fixed up

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit cbf1f97 into SciML:master Jan 19, 2023
@gzagatti gzagatti deleted the jumps-queue-method branch January 30, 2023 06:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants