Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consistently initialize before computing the linearization #2236

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 23, 2023
Merged

Conversation

YingboMa
Copy link
Member

@baggepinnen could you finish up this PR by adding some user configurations so that repeated linearization won't be as expensive?

Copy link

@ai-maintainer ai-maintainer bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI-Maintainer Review for PR - Consistently initialize before computing the linearization

Title and Description 👍

The Title and description are clear and focused

The title and description of the pull request are clear and focused. They effectively communicate the purpose of the changes, which is to ensure consistent initialization before performing the linearization process and to optimize the repeated linearization process by introducing user configurations.

Scope of Changes 👍

The changes are narrowly focused

The changes in this pull request are narrowly focused on a specific issue. The modifications to the Project.toml file and the abstractsystem.jl file are related to the consistent initialization and optimization of the linearization process. There is no indication that the author is trying to resolve multiple issues simultaneously.

Testing 👎

Testing details are missing

The description does not provide any information about how the author tested the changes. It would be helpful for the author to provide details about the testing approach and any relevant test results to ensure the changes have been thoroughly validated.

Code Documentation 👍

No new functions, classes, or methods added

Based on the provided diff, there are no newly added functions, classes, or methods. Therefore, there are no docstrings that need to be added.

Suggested Changes

  • Please provide details about how the changes were tested. This could include the testing methodologies used, specific test cases, and results.
  • Consider adding comments in the code where the OrdinaryDiffEq package is used to explain why it's necessary and how it contributes to the optimization of the linearization process.

Reviewed with AI Maintainer

@YingboMa YingboMa merged commit 8c730af into master Aug 23, 2023
27 of 33 checks passed
@YingboMa YingboMa deleted the mc/lin branch August 23, 2023 14:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants