Skip to content

Libohan incremental qf nia #5

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Apr 14, 2025

Conversation

DouglasLee001
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@DouglasLee001
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is likely due to the backtracking limit of the PCRE engine, as these examples may contain a particularly long assertion.

However, these instances are adapted from existing ones in non-incremental/QF_NIA, and they have been mostly unchanged, so they should not have any form issues.

Perhaps you could consider increasing the backtracking limit of the PCRE engine.

@hansjoergschurr
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you again for the submission!
It seems like this check is generally unreliable. I removed it for now in favor of checking manually. Could you rebase your pull request on the updated main branch?
The header looks good.

@hansjoergschurr
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks again for the submission! I will merge them. Before release we will run some more tests, but overall the benchmarks look great.

@hansjoergschurr hansjoergschurr merged commit ad3020e into SMT-LIB:main Apr 14, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants