Added MessageBoard and message_board_spec

[adamxlowe]

No description provided.

[jwo]

If I run these specs, it fails:

  1) Conductor should tell the engineer to slow down
     Failure/Error: let(:engineer) { Engineer.new }
     ArgumentError:
       wrong number of arguments (0 for 1)
     # ./train.rb:16:in `initialize'
     # ./train_spec.rb:5:in `new'
     # ./train_spec.rb:5:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
     # ./train_spec.rb:9:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'

Do they fail for you?

[adamxlowe]

I added a message board spec for the changed code. I don't know why it
didn't push before.

require 'rspec'
require './train'
describe MessageBoard do

let(:message_board) { MessageBoard.new }
let(:engineer) { Engineer.new(message_board) }
let(:conductor) { Conductor.new(message_board)}

it "should tell the engineer to slow down" do
    message_board.should_receive(:slow_down!)
    conductor.see_danger_coming!
end

it "should confirm to the conductor that it slowed down" do
message_board.should_receive(:confirm_slow_down)
engineer.slowing_down!
end
end

On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Jesse Wolgamott [email protected]:

If I run these specs, it fails:

1. Conductor should tell the engineer to slow down
   Failure/Error: let(:engineer) { Engineer.new }
   ArgumentError:
   wrong number of arguments (0 for 1)

   ./train.rb:16:in `initialize'

   ./train_spec.rb:5:in`new'

   ./train_spec.rb:5:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'

   ./train_spec.rb:9:in`block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'

Do they fail for you?

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/11#issuecomment-36531782
.

[jwo]

so, the specs are still failing for me. Are they passing for you?

[adamxlowe]

rspec message_board_spec.rb

..

Top 2 slowest examples (0.00072 seconds, 100.0% of total time):

MessageBoard should tell the engineer to slow down

0.00045 seconds ./message_board_spec.rb:9

MessageBoard should confirm to the conductor that it slowed down

0.00027 seconds ./message_board_spec.rb:14

Finished in 0.00123 seconds

2 examples, 0 failures

Randomized with seed 6127

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Jesse Wolgamott
[email protected]:

so, the specs are still failing for me. Are they passing for you?

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/11#issuecomment-36664000
.

[jwo]

Hmm, but there are more spec files than the message_board_spec, right?

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Adam Lowe [email protected]
wrote:

rspec message_board_spec.rb
..
Top 2 slowest examples (0.00072 seconds, 100.0% of total time):
MessageBoard should tell the engineer to slow down
0.00045 seconds ./message_board_spec.rb:9
MessageBoard should confirm to the conductor that it slowed down
0.00027 seconds ./message_board_spec.rb:14
Finished in 0.00123 seconds
2 examples, 0 failures
Randomized with seed 6127
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Jesse Wolgamott
[email protected]:

so, the specs are still failing for me. Are they passing for you?

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/11#issuecomment-36664000
.

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#11 (comment)

[adamxlowe]

That's the spec I wrote for the assignment.

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Jesse Wolgamott
[email protected]:

Hmm, but there are more spec files than the message_board_spec, right?

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Adam Lowe [email protected]
wrote:

rspec message_board_spec.rb
..
Top 2 slowest examples (0.00072 seconds, 100.0% of total time):
MessageBoard should tell the engineer to slow down
0.00045 seconds ./message_board_spec.rb:9
MessageBoard should confirm to the conductor that it slowed down
0.00027 seconds ./message_board_spec.rb:14
Finished in 0.00123 seconds
2 examples, 0 failures
Randomized with seed 6127
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Jesse Wolgamott
[email protected]:

so, the specs are still failing for me. Are they passing for you?

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<
https://github.com/RubyoffRails/train-message_expectations/pull/11#issuecomment-36664000>

.

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

#11 (comment)

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/11#issuecomment-36665076
.

[jwo]

Hey Adam --

You should be running rspec . --- and if the spec files were in a spec
directory, you should run rspec spec

tl;dr: You have a failing spec, and should not.

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Adam Lowe [email protected] wrote:

That's the spec I wrote for the assignment.

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Jesse Wolgamott

[email protected]:

Hmm, but there are more spec files than the message_board_spec, right?

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Adam Lowe [email protected]
wrote:

rspec message_board_spec.rb
..
Top 2 slowest examples (0.00072 seconds, 100.0% of total time):
MessageBoard should tell the engineer to slow down
0.00045 seconds ./message_board_spec.rb:9
MessageBoard should confirm to the conductor that it slowed down
0.00027 seconds ./message_board_spec.rb:14
Finished in 0.00123 seconds
2 examples, 0 failures
Randomized with seed 6127
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Jesse Wolgamott
[email protected]:

so, the specs are still failing for me. Are they passing for you?

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<

#11 (comment)

.

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

#11 (comment)

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<
#11 (comment)

.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/11#issuecomment-36665314
.

Jesse Wolgamott @ Comal Productions
Web. Mobile. Training. Code.

http://comalproductions.com
Twitter: @jwo
713.234.0361