Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: add CI checking for node ffi #487

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 31, 2023
Merged

Conversation

Ma233
Copy link
Member

@Ma233 Ma233 commented Oct 28, 2023

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes/features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

🔵 What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)

This PR added a simple smoke test for ffi feature.

🟤 What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)

🟢 What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

☢️ Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)

ℹ️ Other information

Closes #issue

@RyanKung RyanKung changed the title ci: add CI checking for node ffi chore: add CI checking for node ffi Oct 30, 2023
ffi/rings.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We also need to make rings.h and rings_node.dylib downloadable.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should do in another PR.

node/build.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Ma233 Ma233 force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from 07fd982 to 8c16056 Compare October 31, 2023 01:37
@RyanKung RyanKung merged commit b475b55 into RingsNetwork:master Oct 31, 2023
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants