Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Web Billing Accelerated Sandbox #584

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 13, 2025
Merged

Conversation

polmiro
Copy link
Member

@polmiro polmiro commented Jan 13, 2025

Motivation / Description

Add documentation for Web Billing accelerated sandbox.

Copy link

Preview this PR here: https://dev-docs.revenuecat.com/pr-584/

Copy link
Contributor

@antoniobg antoniobg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. Tagging @MrEdwardo so he's aware of the changes

@polmiro polmiro requested a review from MrEdwardo January 13, 2025 10:13
@polmiro polmiro force-pushed the web-billing-accelerated-sandbox branch from 2411d10 to ed3ae5c Compare January 13, 2025 11:25
@polmiro polmiro merged commit 9a541f1 into main Jan 13, 2025
3 checks passed
@polmiro polmiro deleted the web-billing-accelerated-sandbox branch January 13, 2025 14:15
polmiro added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2025
polmiro added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2025
polmiro added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2025
antoniobg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2025
antoniobg added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2025
* Revert "Revert "Document renewal sandbox durations (#584)" (#585)"

This reverts commit e31eb93.

* Add sandbox period mapping

---------

Co-authored-by: Antonio Borrero Granell <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants