Bring a few more GC patches from upstream #165
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I think that keeping a single `remset` (instead of two and keep alternating between them) should be a bit easier to understand and possibly even a bit faster (since we will be accessing the `remset` only once), though that should be a very small difference.
github-actions
bot
added
port-to-v1.10
d-netto
removed
the
port-to-master
kpamnany
approved these changes
Jul 11, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Description
Let's ensure our fork doesn't fall too behind the upstream GC.
Checklist
Requirements for merging:
port-to-*labels that don't apply.