adding review workflow and powerscribe guides

RSNA · Aug 16, 2024 · 9e69762 · 9e69762
1 parent f14c782
commit 9e69762
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 4 changed files with 29 additions and 3 deletions.
diff --git a/astro-docs/astro.config.mjs b/astro-docs/astro.config.mjs
@@ -8,15 +8,14 @@ export default defineConfig({
 	integrations: [
 		starlight({
 			title: 'RSNA/ACR Common Data Elements',
-			social: {
-				github: 'https://github.com/withastro/starlight',
-			},
 			sidebar: [
 				{
 					label: 'Guides',
 					items: [
 						// Each item here is one entry in the navigation menu.
 						{ label: 'Authoring and Conventions', slug: 'guides/author' },
+						{ label: 'Review Process', slug: 'guides/review' },
+						{ label: 'Use CDEs in PowerScribe', slug: 'guides/powerscribe'}
 					],
 				},
 				{

diff --git a/astro-docs/src/assets/workflow.png b/astro-docs/src/assets/workflow.png
diff --git a/astro-docs/src/content/docs/guides/powerscribe.md b/astro-docs/src/content/docs/guides/powerscribe.md
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+title: PowerScribe Integration
+---
+
+<video class="w-75 mx-auto" controls=""> 
+    <source src="https://radelement.org/b2be5967e69267940c48.mp4" type="video/mp4"> 
+    <p> Your browser doesn't support HTML video. Here is a 
+    <a href="https://radelement.org/assets/radelements.demo.revised.mp4" download="radelements.demo.revised.mp4">link to the video</a> instead. 
+    </p>
+</video>
+
+Thanks to Andrew Gomella, MD, Aparna Singhal, MD, and Alex J. Towbin, MD for producing this video!
diff --git a/astro-docs/src/content/docs/guides/review.md b/astro-docs/src/content/docs/guides/review.md
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+---
+title: CDE review and approval process
+---
+
+The RSNA and ACR review all submitted common data elements. The review process mimics peer-reviewed journal submissions.
+
+The first step of review ensures complete submissions, this is performed by ACR/RSNA staff.
+
+Each set is reviewed by a single reviewer, tasked with evaluting adherance to the [Set](../reference/set), [Element](../reference/element), and [Value](../reference/valueset) standards. Reviewers are asked to limit their input on clinical relevance or applicability to egregious clinical errors, or CDEs where the reviewer believes the author's intent is corrupted. 
+
+Iterations between reviewers and authors are encouraged until the CDE set is ready for editorial approval. Each set is reviewed by an editor who may ask for additional revisions or approve for publishing. As shown below proposed CDE sets are stored to RadElement at several steps along the review process.
+
+A detailed workflow diagram is below.
+
+![CDE Workflow Diagram](../../../assets/workflow.png)