Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FOUR-18766: PI Process creation and redirect to modeler #7351

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 17, 2024

Conversation

TinCodes
Copy link
Contributor

@TinCodes TinCodes commented Sep 10, 2024

Tickets solved by this PR:

Solution

  • Completed frontend to redirect to newly created PI process

Related PRs:

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:next
ci:package-ai:task/FOUR-18766

@tokensPM
Copy link

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-377fd0221d.engk8s.processmaker.net

@tokensPM
Copy link

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-377fd0221d.engk8s.processmaker.net

1 similar comment
@tokensPM
Copy link

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-377fd0221d.engk8s.processmaker.net

@TinCodes TinCodes merged commit 104f3e0 into epic/FOUR-18761 Sep 17, 2024
8 of 12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants