FOUR-8764 Added Github Actions

[josechirivella]

Issue & Reproduction Steps

Expected behavior:
Our CI/CD pipeline should be able to run in Github Actions

Actual behavior:
Currently running on CircleCi

Solution

How to Test

Test the steps above

Related Tickets & Packages

• https://processmaker.atlassian.net/browse/FOUR-8764
• https://processmaker.atlassian.net/browse/FOUR-8782

Code Review Checklist

• I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
• This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
• This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
• This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
• This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
• This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
• This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
• This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
• This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

[pmkerberos]

QA server was successfully deployed https://ci-7022fe24b7.eng.processmaker.net

[pmkerberos]

QA server was successfully deployed https://ci-7022fe24b7.eng.processmaker.net

[pmkerberos]

QA server was successfully deployed https://ci-7022fe24b7.eng.processmaker.net

[pmkerberos]

QA server was successfully deployed 2023-06-23T21:08:15+00:00

[processmaker-sonarqube]

SonarQube Quality Gate

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
No Duplication information

[ana-mauricio]

Locally the e2e tests are working

after seeing the errors in CI tests have not been run, It seems there are error in commands that are failing with CI.

@josechirivella

[ana-mauricio]

The suits VerifyARecalculationFiresFlowsAreLocatedImproperlyOnTheDiagram && BoundaryEventValidation.cy.js were corrected
@josechirivella @ryancooley

[josechirivella]

Yup, that makes Github happy. Thanks @ana-mauricio 🥳

[processmaker-sonarqube]

SonarQube Quality Gate

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

0.0% Coverage
0.0% Duplication