-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: enable anonymous issue tracking #1685
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Nick-1979 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 24 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the CI workflow and several components to integrate Sentry for error tracking and performance monitoring. It adds a new step to the CI process for semantic release. Dependencies in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml (1)
80-80
: Fix trailing whitespaceRemove trailing whitespace to maintain consistent code style.
- run: yarn build - + run: yarn build + - name: Upload source maps to SentryAlso applies to: 85-85
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lock
is excluded by!**/yarn.lock
,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml
(1 hunks).gitignore
(1 hunks)package.json
(1 hunks)packages/extension/package.json
(1 hunks)packages/extension/src/extension.ts
(1 hunks)packages/extension/src/packageInfo.ts
(1 hunks)packages/extension/webpack.shared.cjs
(3 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- .gitignore
- packages/extension/src/packageInfo.ts
- packages/extension/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 85-85: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/extension/webpack.shared.cjs (1)
110-115
: Verify Sentry webpack plugin configuration
The Sentry webpack plugin configuration needs verification for proper source map upload.
✅ Verification successful
Sentry configuration is properly implemented
The verification shows that:
- Source map generation is correctly enabled with
devtool: 'source-map'
- Sentry webpack plugin is properly configured and placed after other plugins
- Sentry is correctly initialized in extension.ts with proper DSN and integrations
- Environment variables are properly handled through dotenv-webpack
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Sentry environment configuration
# Check if SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN is configured in .env
if [ -f ".env" ]; then
echo "Checking .env for Sentry configuration..."
grep -E "SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN|SENTRY_ORG|SENTRY_PROJECT" .env
fi
# Verify webpack output directory exists
if [ -d "packages/extension/build" ]; then
echo "Checking for source maps in build directory..."
find packages/extension/build -name "*.map" -type f
fi
Length of output: 55
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the Sentry webpack plugin configuration more thoroughly
# Check webpack config for Sentry plugin
echo "Checking webpack configuration files for Sentry setup..."
rg -l "sentry" packages/extension/
# Check package.json for Sentry dependencies
echo -e "\nChecking Sentry dependencies..."
cat packages/extension/package.json | grep -i "sentry"
# Check for any environment files
echo -e "\nChecking for environment configuration files..."
fd -H "\.env" -t f
fd "\.env\." -t f
# Look for source map configuration in webpack
echo -e "\nChecking source map configuration in webpack..."
rg "devtool|sourceMap" packages/extension/webpack.*.cjs
Length of output: 926
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the specific Sentry configuration and environment setup
# Check the example environment file for Sentry configuration
echo "Checking .env.example for Sentry configuration..."
cat .env.example | grep -i "sentry"
# Check the actual Sentry implementation in webpack.shared.cjs
echo -e "\nChecking Sentry webpack plugin implementation..."
rg -A 5 -B 5 "sentryWebpackPlugin" packages/extension/webpack.shared.cjs
# Check for any Sentry initialization in the extension
echo -e "\nChecking Sentry initialization in extension.ts..."
rg -A 5 -B 5 "Sentry" packages/extension/src/extension.ts
Length of output: 1804
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
packages/extension/webpack.shared.cjs (2)
Line range hint
35-45
: Document the purpose of new webpack rulesThe new rules are marked as "added for polkagate" but lack explanation of their purpose and necessity.
Please add comments explaining:
- Why
fullySpecified: false
is needed for.m?js
files- The specific CSS handling requirements for the project
109-118
: Consider making Sentry configuration more flexibleWhile the Sentry integration is well-structured, consider making the organization and project names configurable via environment variables for better flexibility across different environments.
Consider this modification:
...(process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development' ? [] : [sentryWebpackPlugin({ authToken: process.env.SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN, - org: 'polkagate', - project: 'javascript-react', + org: process.env.SENTRY_ORG || 'polkagate', + project: process.env.SENTRY_PROJECT || 'javascript-react', telemetry: false })] )packages/extension-polkagate/src/partials/SettingSubMenu.tsx (2)
33-35
: Add effect to sync localStorage changes across tabsThe current implementation doesn't handle localStorage changes from other tabs/windows.
+ useEffect(() => { + const handleStorageChange = (e: StorageEvent) => { + if (e.key === 'sentryEnabled') { + setIsSentryEnabled(e.newValue === 'true'); + } + }; + window.addEventListener('storage', handleStorageChange); + return () => window.removeEventListener('storage', handleStorageChange); + }, []);
96-104
: Add tooltip explaining error reporting implicationsUsers should understand what data will be collected when enabling error reporting.
<Grid item pt='10px' textAlign='left'> <Checkbox2 checked={isSentryEnabled} iconStyle={{ transform: 'scale(1.13)' }} label={t('Enable error reporting')} labelStyle={{ fontSize: '17px', fontWeight: 300, marginLeft: '7px' }} onChange={toggleErrorReporting} + tooltip={t('When enabled, anonymous crash reports and performance data will be collected to help improve the extension')} /> </Grid>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
package.json
(3 hunks)packages/extension-polkagate/src/partials/SettingSubMenu.tsx
(5 hunks)packages/extension/package.json
(1 hunks)packages/extension/public/locales/en/translation.json
(1 hunks)packages/extension/src/extension.ts
(1 hunks)packages/extension/src/packageInfo.ts
(1 hunks)packages/extension/webpack.shared.cjs
(4 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/extension/public/locales/en/translation.json
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- packages/extension/src/packageInfo.ts
- packages/extension/package.json
- package.json
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/extension/webpack.shared.cjs (3)
13-13
: LGTM: Sentry webpack plugin import
The import is correctly placed with other webpack plugins.
95-95
: LGTM: Secure environment configuration
Good practice using environment variable with a secure default to 'production'.
32-32
:
Security: Protect source maps in production
While source maps are required for Sentry, exposing them in production could reveal sensitive source code.
Apply this change to secure source maps while maintaining Sentry functionality:
- devtool: 'source-map', // Source map generation must be turned on
+ devtool: process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production' ? 'hidden-source-map' : 'source-map',
This ensures source maps are:
- Available for Sentry error reporting
- Hidden from public access in production
- Accessible during development
packages/extension/src/extension.ts (1)
17-34
:
Security and performance concerns in Sentry configuration
Several critical issues need to be addressed:
- The DSN should be moved to environment variables
- Sampling rates are too high for production
- Extension IDs should be configurable
Additionally:
- Consider adding environment-specific configuration
- Add error boundaries around Sentry initialization
- Add proper error handling for initialization failures
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml (1)
80-80
: Remove trailing whitespaceLines 80 and 85 contain trailing spaces that should be removed.
Apply this diff to fix the formatting:
- name: Build project run: yarn build - + - name: Upload source maps to Sentry env: SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN }} run: npx sentry-cli upload-sourcemaps ./packages/extension/build - + - name: Run Semantic ReleaseAlso applies to: 85-85
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 85-85: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml (2)
78-79
: LGTM: Build step correctly positioned
The build step is appropriately placed before the source map upload step, ensuring that the build artifacts are available.
81-84
:
Add missing Sentry configuration
The Sentry upload step is missing required organization and project configuration.
Apply this diff to add the missing configuration:
- name: Upload source maps to Sentry
env:
SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN }}
+ SENTRY_ORG: ${{ secrets.SENTRY_ORG }}
+ SENTRY_PROJECT: ${{ secrets.SENTRY_PROJECT }}
run: npx sentry-cli upload-sourcemaps ./packages/extension/build
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/extension/webpack.shared.cjs (1)
Line range hint
37-43
: Consider enhancing CSS processing for productionWhile the current CSS configuration works, consider adding optimizations for production builds.
Consider this enhanced configuration:
{ test: /\.css$/, - use: ['style-loader', 'css-loader'] + use: [ + 'style-loader', + { + loader: 'css-loader', + options: { + importLoaders: 1, + modules: { + auto: true, + localIdentName: process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production' + ? '[hash:base64]' + : '[path][name]__[local]' + } + } + }, + 'postcss-loader' + ] }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/extension/webpack.shared.cjs
(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/extension/webpack.shared.cjs (2)
32-32
:
Secure source map access for Sentry integration
While source maps are required for Sentry error tracking, exposing them in production could reveal sensitive source code.
Consider using a more secure configuration:
- devtool: 'source-map', // Source map generation must be turned on
+ devtool: process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production'
+ ? 'hidden-source-map' // Generates source maps but doesn't reference them in bundles
+ : 'source-map',
110-120
: Verify Sentry authentication configuration
The Sentry configuration looks good with appropriate privacy settings. However, let's ensure the auth token is properly configured.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about Sentry configuration in the repository.
Let me try one more verification with corrected commands to check workflow files and package.json content.
Let me check the CI workflow file to understand how the Sentry token is handled.
Sentry authentication is properly configured
The Sentry configuration is correctly set up:
- The auth token is securely managed as a GitHub secret in CI workflow
- Token is properly injected during the build process for source map uploads
- Development builds skip Sentry integration as intended
- Required Sentry dependencies are present in package.json
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Sentry auth token configuration in environment files
# Check if SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN is defined in .env file
echo "Checking .env file for Sentry configuration..."
if [ -f ".env" ]; then
grep -l "SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN" .env || echo "Warning: SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN not found in .env"
fi
# Check if there are any CI environment files
echo "Checking CI environment files..."
fd -t f ".env" .github/
Length of output: 219
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for Sentry configuration in various potential locations
echo "Checking for Sentry configuration files..."
fd -t f "sentry" -E "node_modules"
echo -e "\nChecking for Sentry references in package.json files..."
fd -t f "package.json" -E "node_modules" -x grep -l "sentry"
echo -e "\nChecking for environment variable setup in GitHub workflows..."
fd -t f "*.yml" .github/workflows/ -x grep -l "SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN"
echo -e "\nChecking for environment setup documentation..."
fd -t f "README.md" -x grep -A 3 -i "sentry"
Length of output: 972
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json for Sentry dependencies and configurations
echo "Checking package.json content..."
cat package.json | grep -A 5 "sentry"
echo -e "\nChecking workflow files for Sentry token setup..."
fd -g "*.yml" .github/workflows/ -x grep -l "SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN" {} \;
echo -e "\nChecking for environment variable documentation..."
rg -i "sentry.*token" -A 3 --type md
Length of output: 747
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the CI workflow file for Sentry token configuration
echo "Checking CI workflow configuration..."
cat .github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml | grep -A 5 -B 5 "SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN"
# Check if there's any documentation about environment setup
echo -e "\nChecking for environment setup instructions..."
rg -i "environment|env" README.md
Length of output: 645
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml (2)
78-79
: Consider optimizing by persisting build artifactsWhile this build step is necessary for Sentry source maps upload, you could optimize the workflow by persisting the build artifacts from the earlier build job using GitHub Actions artifacts.
Here's how you could modify the workflow:
build: steps: # ... existing steps ... - name: ${{ matrix.step }} run: yarn ${{ matrix.step }} + - name: Upload build artifacts + uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3 + with: + name: build-artifacts + path: packages/extension/build release: steps: # ... existing steps ... + - name: Download build artifacts + uses: actions/download-artifact@v3 + with: + name: build-artifacts + path: packages/extension/build - - name: Build project - run: yarn build
80-80
: Remove trailing spacesThere are trailing spaces on lines 80 and 85.
Apply this diff to fix the formatting:
- name: Build project run: yarn build - + - name: Upload source maps to Sentry env: SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN }} run: npx sentry-cli sourcemaps upload ./packages/extension/build - + - name: Run Semantic ReleaseAlso applies to: 85-85
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 85-85: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml (1)
81-84
:
Complete the Sentry configuration
The source map upload step is missing required Sentry configuration parameters.
Apply this diff to add the missing configuration:
- name: Upload source maps to Sentry
env:
SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN }}
+ SENTRY_ORG: ${{ secrets.SENTRY_ORG }}
+ SENTRY_PROJECT: ${{ secrets.SENTRY_PROJECT }}
run: npx sentry-cli sourcemaps upload ./packages/extension/build
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml
79-79: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:62: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml
[error] 83-83: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 86-86: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml (1)
78-86
: Verify end-to-end release process
Please ensure that the entire release process works correctly with these new Sentry integration steps:
- Sentry authentication and configuration
- Production build generation
- Source map upload
- Semantic release
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the Sentry configuration and release process.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Sentry integration appears properly configured for the release process
The verification shows that:
- Sentry is properly initialized in
packages/extension/src/extension.ts
with DSN and browser tracing - Source maps are correctly configured in
webpack.shared.cjs
withdevtool: 'source-map'
- The build process is well-structured with proper sequencing:
- Version application (
apply-version
script) - Production build (
build
script) - Source map generation (webpack config)
- Release process (
semantic-release
)
- Version application (
The integration steps in the workflow align with the project's configuration and should work correctly end-to-end.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Sentry configuration and build process
# Check if Sentry CLI is configured in the project
echo "Checking for Sentry configuration..."
fd -t f -e json -e js -e yml "sentry"
# Check build output structure
echo "Checking build configuration..."
fd -t f "webpack|build" -e js -e cjs -e json
# Check for source map configuration
echo "Checking source map configuration..."
rg -i "sourcemap|devtool"
Length of output: 1809
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for Sentry configuration and release process setup
# Look for Sentry initialization and configuration
echo "Checking Sentry initialization..."
rg -i "sentry.init|sentry.config" -A 3
# Check for release-related configuration
echo "Checking release configuration..."
rg -i "release.*version|sentry.*release" -A 2
# Check package.json for build and release scripts
echo "Checking build and release scripts..."
fd -t f "package.json" --exec cat {} \; | jq -r '.scripts | select(. != null)'
# Check for semantic release configuration
echo "Checking semantic release config..."
fd -t f -e json -e yml -e yaml "release"
Length of output: 2811
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
79-79: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:62: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 83-83: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 86-86: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml
(1 hunks)packages/extension/webpack.shared.cjs
(4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/extension/webpack.shared.cjs
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml
86-86: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:67: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
86-86: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:89: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 87-87: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml (2)
78-80
: Enhance build step configuration
The build step should be enhanced with production environment setting and build verification.
Apply this diff to improve the build step:
- name: Build project
- run: yarn build
+ env:
+ NODE_ENV: production
+ run: |
+ yarn build
+ test -d ./packages/extension/build || exit 1
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
81-86
: Enhance source map upload configuration
The source map upload step should include version tracking and validation.
Apply this diff to improve the source map upload:
- name: Upload source maps to Sentry
+ run: |
+ # Verify source maps exist
+ if ! find ./packages/extension/build -name "*.map" -type f | grep -q .; then
+ echo "No source maps found in build directory"
+ exit 1
+ fi
+
+ # Upload source maps with version tracking
+ VERSION=$(node -p "require('./package.json').version")
+ npx sentry-cli releases new "$VERSION"
+ npx sentry-cli releases files "$VERSION" upload-sourcemaps ./packages/extension/build --org "$SENTRY_ORG" --project "$SENTRY_PROJECT"
+ npx sentry-cli releases finalize "$VERSION"
env:
SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN }}
SENTRY_ORG: ${{ secrets.SENTRY_ORG }}
SENTRY_PROJECT: ${{ secrets.SENTRY_PROJECT }}
- run: npx sentry-cli sourcemaps upload ./packages/extension/build --org $SENTRY_ORG --project $SENTRY_PROJECT
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
86-86: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:67: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
86-86: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:89: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml (2)
80-80
: Remove trailing whitespaceThere is a trailing whitespace on line 80 that should be removed.
- run: yarn build - + run: yarn build +🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
78-80
: Add Sentry source map upload stepSince this PR introduces Sentry integration, we should add a step to upload source maps to Sentry after the build.
Add this step after the build:
- name: Upload source maps to Sentry env: SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN }} SENTRY_ORG: ${{ secrets.SENTRY_ORG }} SENTRY_PROJECT: ${{ secrets.SENTRY_PROJECT }} run: | VERSION=$(node -p "require('./package.json').version") npx sentry-cli releases new "$VERSION" npx sentry-cli releases files "$VERSION" upload-sourcemaps ./packages/extension/build npx sentry-cli releases finalize "$VERSION"Please ensure the following secrets are configured in your repository:
SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN
SENTRY_ORG
SENTRY_PROJECT
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml (2)
78-80
: Verify necessity of additional build step
The release job already depends on the build
job (see needs: [build]
). This additional build step might be redundant unless there's a specific reason for rebuilding before release.
Let's verify the build artifacts handling:
Consider either:
- Removing this build step if it's redundant, or
- Adding artifact upload/download steps to preserve the build output between jobs
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the workflow dependencies and build job configuration.
This will help us understand:
- The exact relationship between the build and release jobs
- Whether the build output needs to be preserved between jobs
- The configuration of build artifacts in the project
Build step is necessary in release job
The additional build step in the release job is necessary and not redundant. Here's why:
- The build job and release job run as separate jobs with separate workspaces
- No artifact upload/download steps exist between jobs
- The build process creates zip files (
master-build.zip
,master-src.zip
) that are likely needed for the release - The semantic-release process would need access to the built artifacts to create the release
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if build artifacts are preserved between jobs
# Check for artifact upload/download steps
echo "Checking for artifact handling between jobs:"
rg "actions/upload-artifact|actions/download-artifact" .github/workflows/
# Check if build output is needed for release
echo "Checking release script requirements:"
rg "semantic-release" package.json -A 5
Length of output: 1235
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the build job configuration and job dependencies
echo "Checking workflow configuration:"
cat .github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml
# Check if there are any build artifacts or dist files that need to be preserved
echo -e "\nChecking build output paths:"
rg "dist|build" package.json -A 2
Length of output: 3371
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
78-80
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance build step configuration for production deployment
The build step should be configured for production and include verification of the build output. Additionally, since this PR introduces Sentry integration, we should ensure source maps are generated correctly.
Apply this diff to improve the build step:
- name: Build project
+ env:
+ NODE_ENV: production
+ GENERATE_SOURCEMAP: true
run: |
- yarn build
+ yarn build
+ # Verify build output
+ test -d ./packages/extension/build || exit 1
+ # Verify source maps for Sentry
+ find ./packages/extension/build -name "*.map" -type f || echo "Warning: No source maps found"
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml (2)
Line range hint
78-81
: Enhance semantic-release configurationThe semantic-release setup needs additional configuration:
- Consider using the conventional
GITHUB_TOKEN
name instead ofSR_TOKEN
for better maintainability- Add semantic-release configuration to specify release rules and plugins
Apply this diff to enhance the configuration:
- name: Run Semantic Release env: - GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SR_TOKEN }} + GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} + NPM_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.NPM_TOKEN }} run: npx semantic-releaseAlso, create a
.releaserc.json
file in the root directory:{ "branches": ["main"], "plugins": [ "@semantic-release/commit-analyzer", "@semantic-release/release-notes-generator", "@semantic-release/github" ] }🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 77-77: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
77-77
: Remove trailing spacesThere are trailing spaces on line 77 that should be removed for consistency.
Apply this diff to fix the formatting:
- +🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 77-77: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml
[error] 77-77: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Version Updates
Localization