Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: move partial schema update to api-reference #1640

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2024
Merged

docs: move partial schema update to api-reference #1640

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2024

Conversation

EgeAytin
Copy link
Member

@EgeAytin EgeAytin commented Sep 28, 2024

docs: move partial schema update to api-reference

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced OpenAPI specifications for the health check and partial schema update endpoints.
    • Enhanced API documentation with new references for partial write functionality.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Clarified documentation regarding partial updates to schemas.
  • Documentation

    • Updated docs/mint.json to reflect changes in operations and added new API reference pages.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces new OpenAPI specifications for two endpoints: a health check endpoint (GET /healthz) and a partial schema update endpoint (PATCH /v1/tenants/{tenant_id}/schemas/partial-write). Additionally, modifications were made to the docs/mint.json file, which included the removal of an operation related to partial schema updates and the addition of a reference to the partial write functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/api-reference/health/health-api.mdx Added OpenAPI specification for the health check endpoint: GET /healthz.
docs/api-reference/schema/partial-write.mdx Added OpenAPI specification for partial schema updates: PATCH /v1/tenants/{tenant_id}/schemas/partial-write.
docs/mint.json Removed operation: "operations/partial-schema-update"; added page: "api-reference/schema/partial-write".

Possibly related PRs

  • docs: remove the signup on header #1602: The changes in docs/mint.json involve modifications to the file, but they do not relate to the OpenAPI specification for the health check endpoint introduced in the main PR.

Poem

🐇 In the meadow, changes bloom,
Health checks now clear the gloom.
Partial writes, a new delight,
Documentation shines so bright!
Hops of joy, we celebrate,
For updates made, we elevate! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
docs/api-reference/schema/partial-write.mdx (3)

2-3: LGTM! Consider adding a brief description.

The addition of the OpenAPI specification is excellent. It clearly defines the endpoint for the partial schema update.

Consider adding a brief description after the title to provide an immediate overview of the endpoint's purpose. For example:

---
title: Partial Schema Update
openapi: patch /v1/tenants/{tenant_id}/schemas/partial-write
description: Endpoint for making partial updates to the schema by adding or modifying actions within individual entities.
---

Line range hint 10-36: Well-structured endpoint definition and request payload.

The endpoint definition and request payload structure are clearly documented. The JSON example and behavior description provide valuable information for API users.

Consider adding a brief explanation of the HTTP status codes that the endpoint might return, especially for error cases. This would help developers handle different scenarios more effectively.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~7-~7: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...roll out new features or API endpoints, features each addition often necessitates corres...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)


Line range hint 38-115: Excellent example usage section.

The example usage section is comprehensive and clearly illustrates the partial schema update process. The inclusion of the existing schema, update request, and resulting schema provides a complete picture of how the API works.

To further enhance the documentation, consider adding a brief explanation of potential error scenarios and how they would be handled by the API. This could include examples of invalid requests and the corresponding error responses.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~7-~7: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...roll out new features or API endpoints, features each addition often necessitates corres...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between de9b870 and 5f4fe7f.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • docs/api-reference/health/health-api.mdx (1 hunks)
  • docs/api-reference/schema/partial-write.mdx (1 hunks)
  • docs/mint.json (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
docs/api-reference/health/health-api.mdx (1)

1-3: LGTM: Health check endpoint specification added.

The addition of the health check endpoint specification is a good practice for API documentation. It provides developers with information about the availability of a health check endpoint.

Suggestion: Expand the OpenAPI specification with more details.

Consider expanding the OpenAPI specification to include more details about the health check endpoint. This could include:

  • Expected response codes (e.g., 200 for healthy, 503 for unhealthy)
  • Response body structure
  • Any query parameters if applicable
  • A brief description of the endpoint's purpose

Here's an example of how you might expand it:

---
openapi: 3.0.0
paths:
  /healthz:
    get:
      summary: Health Check
      description: Returns the health status of the API
      responses:
        '200':
          description: Healthy
          content:
            application/json:
              schema:
                type: object
                properties:
                  status:
                    type: string
                    example: "OK"
        '503':
          description: Unhealthy
---

Verify: Is this the intended location for the partial schema update documentation?

The PR objectives mention moving partial schema update documentation to the API reference, but this file only contains a health check endpoint specification. Please verify if this is the correct file for the intended changes or if additional files need to be updated.

docs/api-reference/schema/partial-write.mdx (1)

6-8: Clear and concise introduction.

The introduction effectively explains the need for partial schema updates and introduces the endpoint. It provides good context for the readers.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~7-~7: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...roll out new features or API endpoints, features each addition often necessitates corres...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)

docs/mint.json (3)

323-323: Removal of partial schema update from Operations section is correct.

The removal of "operations/partial-schema-update" from the Operations group aligns with the PR objective to relocate this documentation to the API reference section.

To ensure this change doesn't create a documentation gap, please verify that:

  1. All relevant information from the removed "operations/partial-schema-update" is now included in the new API reference section.
  2. Any internal links or references to the old location are updated to point to the new location.

369-369: Addition of partial write to API reference is correct.

The addition of "api-reference/schema/partial-write" to the Schema Service group in the API reference section is in line with the PR objective.

Could you please clarify the change in naming convention from "partial-schema-update" to "partial-write"? This will help ensure consistency in terminology throughout the documentation.


323-323: Overall, the changes successfully relocate the partial schema update documentation.

The removal from the Operations section and addition to the API reference section achieve the PR's objective of moving the partial schema update documentation.

To ensure a smooth transition for users:

  1. Consider adding a note in the Operations section directing users to the new location of the partial schema update documentation.
  2. Update any existing documentation or guides that may reference the old location.
  3. If not already planned, consider updating the changelog or release notes to mention this documentation restructuring.

Also applies to: 369-369

@EgeAytin EgeAytin merged commit c38c78f into master Sep 28, 2024
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant