Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mention missing World#regenerateChunk implementation in jd #12109

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 15, 2025

Conversation

masmc05
Copy link
Contributor

@masmc05 masmc05 commented Feb 13, 2025

In 1.14 spigot removed the implementation of this api, but this information is still not present in the javadocs. This also deprecates for removal the api, as with newer versions it's harder and harder to imagine this api coming back.

@masmc05 masmc05 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 13, 2025 19:22
@Doc94
Copy link
Contributor

Doc94 commented Feb 13, 2025

maybe change the message in the implementation too (and cleanup that comment code)? currently its like "if can fix..."

@Warriorrrr
Copy link
Member

It was re-implemented for a while in 1.18.1 in this commit, don't remember in what version it was removed again though

@lynxplay
Copy link
Contributor

Pretty recently iirc? We can deprecate for removal, the comment seems overkill.

@masmc05
Copy link
Contributor Author

masmc05 commented Feb 13, 2025

It was re-implemented for a while in 1.18.1 in this commit, don't remember in what version it was removed again though

Yeah, seems like around 1.21/1.21.1, as 1.20.6 still had the api implemented

@Warriorrrr Warriorrrr merged commit 4041678 into PaperMC:main Feb 15, 2025
3 checks passed
@masmc05 masmc05 deleted the mention-missing-impl branch February 16, 2025 20:03
Y2Kwastaken pushed a commit to Y2Kwastaken/Paper that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2025
…aperMC#12109)

* Mention missing impl

* Clean the implementation out of years old code

* Change the jd comment

* Move to default method

---------

Co-authored-by: Bjarne Koll <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Merged
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants