Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improving coverage of OrgPost.tsx #3185

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop-postgres
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

NishantSinghhhhh
Copy link
Contributor

@NishantSinghhhhh NishantSinghhhhh commented Jan 6, 2025

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Feature enhancement for the OrgPost component.

Issue Number:
Fixes #3033

Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes. Added comprehensive tests for the OrgPost component, including edge cases for pagination handlers and UI interactions.

Snapshots/Videos:

If required, videos of the new functionality can be attached.
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Yes, updated the relevant documentation in Talawa-Docs to reflect the changes in the OrgPost component.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests

    • Added comprehensive test suite for pagination handlers in the OrgPost component
    • Introduced interfaces to support pagination testing
    • Implemented tests for handling next and previous page scenarios, including edge cases
  • Improvements

    • Refined pagination logic in OrgPost component
    • Removed console logging
    • Added test ID attribute to improve component testability

Signed-off-by: NishantSinghhhhh <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request focuses on enhancing the pagination functionality and test coverage for the OrgPost component. Changes were made to both the OrgPost.test.tsx and OrgPost.tsx files, introducing new interfaces for pagination data, adding comprehensive test cases for pagination handlers, and refining the pagination logic in the main component. The modifications aim to improve code testability and robustness.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.test.tsx Added InterfacePageInfo and InterfaceOrgPostListData interfaces. Implemented a new test suite for pagination handlers with mock functions and test cases covering various scenarios.
src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.tsx Removed console log for organization post data. Updated pagination logic with optional chaining. Added data-testid to the "Next" button for improved testability.

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant OrgPost
    participant PaginationHandlers
    
    User->>OrgPost: Interact with pagination
    OrgPost->>PaginationHandlers: Call handleNextPage/handlePreviousPage
    PaginationHandlers-->>OrgPost: Update pagination state
    OrgPost->>User: Render updated posts
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Improve Code Coverage [#3033]
Create/Update Test Cases
Remove Coverage Bypass Statements No explicit removal of coverage bypass statements observed

Suggested reviewers

  • disha1202

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, pagination's new dance,
Tests spinning with each cursor's glance,
Next and previous, buttons so bright,
Coverage climbing to a perfect height!
Code rabbit's magic, clean and lean! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.71%. Comparing base (c8a1290) to head (f780573).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #3185       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage             19.99%   89.71%   +69.72%     
=====================================================
  Files                   302      323       +21     
  Lines                  7687     8452      +765     
  Branches               1677     1899      +222     
=====================================================
+ Hits                   1537     7583     +6046     
+ Misses                 6054      644     -5410     
- Partials                 96      225      +129     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.tsx (2)

250-250: Improve maintainability with a more descriptive function name.

The function sortPosts is straightforward but somewhat generic. Consider providing a name that better matches the purpose, such as sortAndFilterPosts, if you add filtering in the future.


429-433: Add error boundary for safer pagination.

These lines handle the “Next” page functionality using optional chaining, which is good. However, if orgPostListData?.organizations[0]?.posts?.pageInfo is unexpectedly null at runtime, the button might be in a conflicting disabled state or cause confusion. Consider displaying an error message or fallback UI when pagination info is missing or malformed.

src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.test.tsx (4)

16-17: Consolidate imports.

It’s common to import jest from '@jest/globals' at the global scope for debugging or mocking purposes. If jest is only used within these tests, consider grouping related test libraries in the import statement for clarity.


18-21: Enhance naming for clarity.

Renaming InterfacePageInfo to a more specific name (e.g., PostsPageInfo) might better reflect its usage across the codebase.


23-31: Use consistent array/record notation for readability.

Though the code is valid, consider using more explicit interface structures for organizations and posts (e.g., InterfaceOrgPostsResult with arrays) for future maintainability. This can help avoid confusion when multiple arrays or objects are nested deeply.


708-849: Expand edge case tests for pagination.

You’ve done an excellent job covering undefined and null states for pagination data. Enhance even further by testing scenarios where endCursor and startCursor are present but hasNextPage or hasPreviousPage are false, ensuring consistent behavior for partial pagination states.

Would you like additional test examples demonstrating how to mock partial states using different combinations of pageInfo flags?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c8a1290 and f780573.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.test.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.tsx (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Test Application

@rishav-jha-mech
Copy link
Contributor

rishav-jha-mech commented Jan 8, 2025

@NishantSinghhhhh please attach a screenshot of current test coverage for OrgPost.tsx file.

Also i can see that OrgPost.tsx file still has some istanbul ignore next comments, the acceptance criteria for this PR is to have 100% test coverage, after removing istanbul ignore next

@rishav-jha-mech rishav-jha-mech self-requested a review January 8, 2025 20:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants