Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

last version of the manuscript #62

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2025
Merged

last version of the manuscript #62

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2025

Conversation

ypriverol
Copy link
Contributor

@ypriverol ypriverol commented Feb 10, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the citation for the PRIDE database reference with revised title, author list, publication volume, pages, and year.
    • Adjusted in-text citation references to align with the new citation details across the documentation.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request replaces an existing article entry in the bibliography file with a new one. The old entry (Perez-Riverol2022-ow) is removed and replaced by a new entry (Perez-Riverol2025-mo) with updated title, authors, abstract, journal volume, pages, and year. Additionally, citation references in the markdown file are updated to refer to the new citation key, ensuring consistency in the documentation.

Changes

File Change Summary
paper/paper.bib Replaced the old article entry (Perez-Riverol2022-ow) with a new one (Perez-Riverol2025-mo). Updated title, authors, abstract (including mentions of a new file transfer protocol and PRIDE chatbot), volume (50→53), pages ("D543--D552" → "D543--D553"), and year (2022→2025).
paper/paper.md Updated citation references from [@Perez-Riverol2022-ow] to [@Perez-Riverol2025-mo] in two instances.

Poem

I'm a rabbit with a hop so spry,
Scanning updates that catch my eye,
A bib file revamped, a markdown rhyme,
New keys and data ahead in time,
Hopping through change with a joyful cheer 🐰,
Celebrating updates, crisp and clear!


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6ae6183 and 04c7b58.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • paper/paper.pdf is excluded by !**/*.pdf
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • paper/paper.bib (1 hunks)
  • paper/paper.md (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • paper/paper.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (1)
paper/paper.bib (1)

1-34: Verify the publication details for the future publication.

The article entry appears to be for a future publication (2025) which raises some concerns:

  1. The volume number should be 54 for 2025 (current volume in 2024 is 52, as seen in the Thakur2024-zu entry)
  2. Consider using a preprint citation if the article is not published yet

Let's verify the latest volume of Nucleic Acids Research:

✅ Verification successful

🌐 Web query:

What is the latest volume of Nucleic Acids Research journal in 2024?

💡 Result:

The latest volume of Nucleic Acids Research in 2024 is Volume 52, Issue D1, released in January 2024 as part of its annual database special issue[1][7][8]. This edition contains 180 papers covering new biological databases (90 papers), updates to existing resources (83 papers), and updates from databases previously published elsewhere (7 papers)[1][3][8]. Key updates include GenBank, JASPAR, and AlphaFold Protein Structure Database[1][7], while new databases like NMPFamsDB and OPIA are highlighted as Breakthrough Articles[1][8].

Citations:


Publication details for future entry need adjustments.

The web query confirms that the 2024 Nucleic Acids Research database issue is in Volume 52. In our bibliography, the 2025 entry is assigned Volume 53. By standard increment (one volume per year), the 2025 entry should likely be Volume 53, not Volume 54 as previously suggested. You may want to verify if the journal’s volume numbering follows a different pattern or if this entry is meant to reference a preprint. Otherwise, consider updating the entry accordingly.

  • Reassess whether the future publication year (2025) and its volume (53) are intentional.
  • Confirm if a preprint citation is more appropriate if the final publication details aren’t available yet.

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@ypriverol ypriverol merged commit b5c2f3a into master Feb 10, 2025
9 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Feb 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant