fix: create application request and role guard introduction #338
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the OsmoX API Postman collections, focusing on the removal of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (22)
apps/api/src/common/decorators/roles.decorator.ts (3)
4-5: LGTM: Type definition ensures type safety.The
UserRoleValuestype definition correctly restricts the allowed values to those defined inUserRoles, ensuring type safety in the decorator usage.Consider updating the comment to be more specific:
// Type definition for allowed role values (only values from UserRoles)
7-8: LGTM with suggestions: Roles decorator implementation is correct.The
Rolesdecorator is correctly implemented usingSetMetadatato set roles metadata. The use of rest parameters andUserRoleValues[]type ensures flexible and type-safe role assignment.Consider the following improvements:
- Add an explicit return type to the function.
- Remove the ESLint disable comment if the return type is added.
- Add a brief JSDoc comment explaining the decorator's usage.
Here's a suggested implementation:
/** * Decorator that assigns roles to a route handler. * @param roles - The roles to be assigned to the route handler. */ export const Roles = (...roles: UserRoleValues[]): MethodDecorator => SetMetadata('roles', roles);
1-8: Summary: Roles decorator implementation aligns with PR objectives.This new file introduces a
Rolesdecorator that provides a foundation for role-based access control in the application. This aligns well with the PR objectives of addressing issues related to the creation of application requests, as it allows for fine-grained control over who can perform certain actions.The implementation is correct and type-safe, with only minor suggestions for improvement. This decorator will be a valuable addition to the project's authentication and authorization system.
As you integrate this decorator into the application request creation process:
- Ensure that the roles are properly checked in a guard or interceptor.
- Update the API documentation to reflect the role requirements for each endpoint.
- Consider implementing unit tests for endpoints using this decorator to verify role-based access control.
apps/api/src/modules/providers/providers.resolver.ts (2)
14-15: Effective implementation of role-based access controlThe addition of
@Roles(UserRoles.ADMIN)and@UseGuards(GqlAuthGuard, RolesGuard)decorators effectively implements role-based access control for the entireProvidersResolverclass. This change restricts access to admin users only, enhancing security.Consider swapping the order of guards in the
@UseGuardsdecorator to@UseGuards(RolesGuard, GqlAuthGuard). This ensures that authentication is performed before checking roles, which is a more typical and slightly more efficient approach.
1-33: Overall improvement in security and code simplificationThe changes in this file significantly enhance the security of the
ProvidersResolverby implementing role-based access control. The resolver is now restricted to admin users only, which aligns well with the PR objectives of fixing issues related to the creation of application requests.The simplification of the
createProviderandfindAllmethods by removing the@Context()parameter andauthorizationHeaderextraction improves code readability and maintainability. This change is consistent with the new role-based access control implemented at the class level.Consider documenting these security changes in the project's API documentation to ensure that frontend developers and other team members are aware of the new access restrictions for provider-related operations.
apps/api/src/modules/applications/applications.resolver.ts (1)
14-15: LGTM: Role-based access control implemented correctly.The addition of
@Roles(UserRoles.ADMIN)and the update to@UseGuards(GqlAuthGuard, RolesGuard)correctly implement role-based access control for theApplicationsResolverclass. This ensures that only admin users can access the resolver's methods, which aligns with the PR objectives.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of these guards for better code documentation:
// Ensure only authenticated admin users can access these resolver methods @Roles(UserRoles.ADMIN) @UseGuards(GqlAuthGuard, RolesGuard)apps/api/docs/api-documentation.md (2)
350-351: Approve update to authentication method for fetching applicationsThe change from
server-api-keyto Bearerauthorization-tokenis a positive update. It reflects a more standard and secure authentication method using bearer tokens. The explicit mention of theAdminrole clarifies the access control for this endpoint.To ensure consistency throughout the documentation:
- Review and update any other mentions of
server-api-keyto use bearer tokens.- Clarify the
Adminrole requirement for other admin-only endpoints.Would you like me to search for other occurrences of
server-api-keyin the documentation?
Line range hint
1-624: Summary of API documentation changesThe changes in this file enhance the security and clarity of the API documentation:
- Removal of
userIdfrom theCreateApplicationmutation improves security by preventing arbitrary user assignment.- Update to authentication method for fetching applications, using bearer tokens instead of API keys, aligns with modern security practices.
These changes positively impact the API's security posture and provide clearer guidance for API consumers. Ensure these changes are consistently applied across the entire API and its documentation.
Consider implementing the following to further improve API security and usability:
- Use OAuth 2.0 or OpenID Connect for more robust authentication and authorization.
- Implement rate limiting to protect against abuse.
- Add versioning to the API endpoints to facilitate future updates without breaking existing integrations.
apps/api/OsmoX-API.postman_collection.json (1)
784-784: LGTM! Consider updating documentation for this API change.The removal of the
userIdfield from thecreateApplicationInputis a good simplification of the API. This change likely means that the server will determine the user ID from the authentication context, which is a more secure and maintainable approach.To ensure a smooth transition for API consumers:
- Update the API documentation to reflect this change.
- If not already implemented, ensure that the server correctly extracts the user ID from the authentication context.
- Consider adding a deprecation notice in the previous version of the API to inform users of the upcoming change.
apps/api/OsmoX.postman_collection.json (5)
Line range hint
3433-3554: Comprehensive authentication test casesThe authentication-related requests in the collection are well-designed and cover important scenarios, including successful login, invalid credentials, missing password, and bad requests. The use of GraphQL mutations for authentication is consistent with modern API practices.
Positive aspects:
- Coverage of both success and error cases
- Validation of response structure and error messages
- Use of GraphQL mutations for authentication
Suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding a test case for token expiration or refresh to ensure the API handles authentication timeouts correctly.
Line range hint
1-3278: Comprehensive notification test suiteThe notification-related requests in the collection are extensive and well-structured, covering various notification types such as SMTP, Mailgun, WhatsApp, SMS, and more. Each notification type includes tests for success cases, error scenarios, and invalid API key handling.
Strengths:
- Thorough coverage of multiple notification types
- Inclusion of success and error cases for each type
- Testing of important scenarios like missing fields and invalid channel types
- Use of different provider IDs to ensure proper routing
Suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding test cases for rate limiting and bulk notifications to ensure the API can handle high-volume scenarios efficiently.
Line range hint
3279-4058: Well-designed application and provider management testsThe collection includes comprehensive tests for fetching and creating applications and providers. The use of GraphQL queries and mutations for these operations allows for flexible data fetching and creation.
Positive aspects:
- Coverage of success and error cases
- Testing of access control scenarios (e.g., non-admin users)
- Use of GraphQL for flexible data operations
- Inclusion of bad request scenarios
Suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding test cases for updating and deleting applications and providers to ensure full CRUD functionality is covered.
Line range hint
4059-4365: Effective webhook and server key management testsThe collection includes well-designed tests for webhook registration and server key generation. The use of GraphQL mutations for these operations is consistent with the rest of the collection.
Strengths:
- Coverage of success and error cases
- Testing of important scenarios like duplicate webhooks and unknown providers
- Consistent use of GraphQL mutations
Suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding test cases for webhook updates and deletions, as well as key rotation or revocation scenarios, to ensure comprehensive coverage of these features.
Line range hint
1-4365: Excellent and comprehensive API test collectionThis Postman collection for the OsmoX API is exceptionally well-structured and comprehensive. It covers a wide range of functionality, including authentication, various notification types, application and provider management, webhook registration, and server key generation.
Key strengths:
- Thorough coverage of API functionality
- Consistent use of GraphQL for flexible data operations
- Inclusion of both success and error scenarios for each feature
- Well-organized folder structure for easy navigation
- Use of environment variables for sensitive data
Suggestions for further improvement:
- Add test cases for rate limiting and bulk operations to ensure API performance under load
- Include tests for updating and deleting resources where applicable (e.g., applications, providers, webhooks)
- Add scenarios for token refresh and expiration in authentication tests
- Consider adding tests for key rotation or revocation in server key management
- Implement data-driven tests using Postman's data file feature to test with multiple input sets
Overall, this collection provides a solid foundation for testing the OsmoX API and will greatly aid in maintaining API quality and reliability.
apps/api/src/common/guards/role.guard.ts (3)
40-41: Define an interface for the decoded JWT tokenFor type safety and clarity, define an interface representing the expected structure of the decoded token.
Add the interface:
interface DecodedToken { role: UserRoles; // Add other properties as needed }Update the token verification:
- const decodedToken = this.jwtService.verify(token, { secret }); + const decodedToken = this.jwtService.verify<DecodedToken>(token, { secret }); const userRoleId = decodedToken.role;
35-36: Handle missing JWT secret configuration gracefullyWhile
getOrThrowwill throw an error ifJWT_SECRETis not set, providing a clear error message can aid in debugging configuration issues.Consider wrapping this in a try-catch block with a custom error message:
- const secret = this.configService.getOrThrow('JWT_SECRET'); + let secret: string; + try { + secret = this.configService.getOrThrow('JWT_SECRET'); + } catch (error) { + throw new InternalServerErrorException('JWT secret is not configured'); + }
1-7: Organize imports according to project conventionsReview the import statement order to match the project's coding standards, such as grouping external and internal imports separately.
Example of organized imports:
import { Injectable, CanActivate, ExecutionContext } from '@nestjs/common'; import { Reflector } from '@nestjs/core'; import { GqlExecutionContext } from '@nestjs/graphql'; import { JwtService } from '@nestjs/jwt'; import { ConfigService } from '@nestjs/config'; import { UserRoles } from 'src/common/constants/database';apps/api/src/modules/providers/providers.service.ts (2)
Line range hint
30-43: Security Concern: Removal of Authorization Checks increateProviderMethodThe
createProvidermethod no longer includes an authorization check to verify if the user has the necessary permissions to create a provider. Removing theauthorizationHeaderparameter and the associated admin check may allow unauthorized users to perform this action, potentially leading to security vulnerabilities.Consider reintroducing the authorization logic to ensure that only authorized users can create providers. If the authorization checks have been moved to a different layer (e.g., controller or middleware), please verify that they are effectively preventing unauthorized access.
Line range hint
65-73: Security Concern: Removal of Authorization Checks ingetAllProvidersMethodBy removing the
authorizationHeaderparameter and the associated admin check from thegetAllProvidersmethod, the code may allow unauthorized users to retrieve all providers. This could expose sensitive data and pose security risks.Ensure that appropriate access control mechanisms are in place to restrict access to this method. If authorization is handled elsewhere in the application (such as in a middleware or a higher-level controller), please confirm that it adequately protects this endpoint.
apps/api/src/modules/applications/applications.service.ts (3)
Line range hint
50-77: Fix Incorrect Extraction of Authorization HeaderIn
getUserEntryFromToken, you're usingauthHeader.toString()to get the bearer token, which is incorrect sinceauthHeaderis aRequestobject. This can cause issues in token extraction and lead to unauthorized access errors.Update the method to extract the Authorization header correctly from the request:
- async getUserEntryFromToken(authHeader: Request): Promise<User> { + async getUserEntryFromToken(request: Request): Promise<User> { try { - const bearerToken = authHeader.toString(); + const bearerToken = request.headers['authorization'] || request.headers['Authorization']; if (!bearerToken || !bearerToken.startsWith('Bearer ')) { throw new UnauthorizedException('Missing or malformed authorization header'); }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 77-77: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
Line range hint
50-77: Remove Redundant Catch BlockThe
catchblock ingetUserEntryFromTokenrethrows the original error without additional handling, making it unnecessary. This adds extra complexity without benefit.Simplify the code by removing the redundant
try...catchblock:async getUserEntryFromToken(request: Request): Promise<User> { - try { const bearerToken = request.headers['authorization'] || request.headers['Authorization']; if (!bearerToken || !bearerToken.startsWith('Bearer ')) { throw new UnauthorizedException('Missing or malformed authorization header'); } // ... rest of your code ... return userEntry; - } catch (error) { - throw error; - } }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 77-77: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
Security Concern Confirmed: Unrestricted Access to All Applications
The
getAllApplicationsmethod inapps/api/src/modules/applications/applications.service.tsdoes not perform an admin role check, allowing any authenticated user to retrieve all application records. This could expose sensitive data to unauthorized users.
- File:
apps/api/src/modules/applications/applications.service.ts- Method:
getAllApplications🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
81-86: Security Concern: Unrestricted Access to All ApplicationsThe
getAllApplicationsmethod no longer checks for admin privileges, allowing any authenticated user to retrieve all application records. This could expose sensitive data to unauthorized users.Please verify if removing the admin role check is intentional and aligns with the project's security requirements. If not, consider reintroducing role-based access control.
To help verify role checks in the codebase, run the following script:
[/run_scripts]
[/run_scripts]
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for admin role checks in ApplicationsService. rg --type typescript 'ApplicationsService' -A 50 | rg 'UserRoles.ADMIN' -A 5Length of output: 109
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for admin role checks in ApplicationsService within TypeScript files. # Search for ApplicationsService.ts or ApplicationsService.tsx files and then look for UserRoles.ADMIN within them rg 'ApplicationsService' --glob '*.ts*' -A 50 | rg 'UserRoles\.ADMIN' -A 5Length of output: 658
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify presence of admin role checks in ApplicationsService.ts. rg 'UserRoles\.ADMIN' apps/api/src/modules/applications/applications.service.ts -A 5Length of output: 86
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 77-77: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- apps/api/OsmoX-API.postman_collection.json (1 hunks)
- apps/api/OsmoX.postman_collection.json (7 hunks)
- apps/api/docs/api-documentation.md (1 hunks)
- apps/api/src/common/decorators/roles.decorator.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/api/src/common/guards/role.guard.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/api/src/modules/applications/applications.resolver.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/api/src/modules/applications/applications.service.ts (3 hunks)
- apps/api/src/modules/applications/dto/create-application.input.ts (0 hunks)
- apps/api/src/modules/providers/providers.resolver.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/api/src/modules/providers/providers.service.ts (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- apps/api/src/modules/applications/dto/create-application.input.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
apps/api/src/modules/applications/applications.service.ts
[error] 77-77: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
apps/api/src/common/decorators/roles.decorator.ts (1)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are appropriate for the decorator implementation.The imports of
SetMetadatafrom '@nestjs/common' andUserRolesfrom '../constants/database' are correctly chosen for implementing a role-based decorator in NestJS.apps/api/src/modules/providers/providers.resolver.ts (3)
9-11: Improved security with role-based access controlThe addition of
Roles,UserRoles, andRolesGuardimports indicates a shift towards role-based access control. This change enhances the security of the application by restricting access to authorized roles.
30-31: SimplifiedfindAllmethodThe removal of the
@Context()parameter andauthorizationHeaderextraction simplifies thefindAllmethod. This change is consistent with the new role-based access control implemented at the class level.Please verify that the
providerService.getAllProvidersmethod no longer requires theauthorizationHeader. Run the following script to check the method signature:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the signature of the getAllProviders method in the ProvidersService ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'class ProvidersService { $$$ getAllProviders($_) { $$$ } $$$ }'
22-23: SimplifiedcreateProvidermethodThe removal of the
@Context()parameter andauthorizationHeaderextraction simplifies thecreateProvidermethod. This change is consistent with the new role-based access control implemented at the class level.Please verify that the
providerService.createProvidermethod no longer requires theauthorizationHeader. Run the following script to check the method signature:✅ Verification successful
Verification of
providerService.createProviderMethodThe
createProvidermethod inProvidersServiceno longer requires theauthorizationHeaderparameter. This aligns with the updated role-based access control implemented at the class level.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the signature of the createProvider method in the ProvidersService ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'class ProvidersService { $$$ createProvider($_) { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 115
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the createProvider method in ProvidersService to verify its signature rg 'class\s+ProvidersService' -A 20 | rg 'createProvider\s*\('Length of output: 196
apps/api/src/modules/applications/applications.resolver.ts (2)
9-11: LGTM: New imports for role-based access control.The new imports for
Roles,RolesGuard, andUserRolesare correctly added and necessary for implementing role-based access control (RBAC) in the resolver.
37-37: LGTM: SimplifiedfindAllmethod, but verifyApplicationsServicechanges.The simplification of the
findAllmethod by removing the@Context()parameter andauthorizationHeaderusage is a good improvement. This change aligns with the PR objectives of streamlining the authorization process.Please ensure that the
ApplicationsService.getAllApplicationsmethod has been updated to no longer expect theauthorizationHeaderparameter. Run the following script to verify:apps/api/docs/api-documentation.md (1)
Line range hint
310-315: Approve removal ofuserIdfromCreateApplicationmutationThe removal of the
userIdparameter from theCreateApplicationmutation is a positive change. It enhances security by preventing arbitrary user assignment during application creation. This change implies that the API now determines the user internally, likely from the authentication token.To ensure this change is correctly implemented, please verify the backend logic:
Also applies to: 321-326
✅ Verification successful
Verified:
userIdparameter has been successfully removed from theCreateApplicationmutation. No references found in the backend code.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the backend correctly associates the application with the authenticated user # Test: Search for the application creation logic rg --type typescript "createApplication.*userId" apps/api/srcLength of output: 98
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the backend correctly associates the application with the authenticated user # Test: Search for the application creation logic without specifying file type rg "createApplication.*userId" apps/api/src --type-add 'ts=**/*.ts' --type-add 'tsx=**/*.tsx' --files-with-matchesLength of output: 176
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the backend correctly associates the application with the authenticated user # Test: Search for the application creation logic without specifying file type, using correct type definitions rg "createApplication.*userId" apps/api/src --type-add 'ts:*.ts' --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --files-with-matchesLength of output: 110
apps/api/OsmoX.postman_collection.json (1)
Line range hint
1-4365: Well-structured and comprehensive Postman collectionThe OsmoX Postman collection is well-organized and covers a wide range of functionality for the API. It includes various request folders for different types of notifications and API operations, with tests for both success and error scenarios. The collection's structure makes it easy to navigate and test different aspects of the API, including authentication, notifications, applications, providers, webhooks, and server keys.
Good practices observed:
- Comprehensive coverage of API functionality
- Inclusion of both success and error test cases
- Use of environment variables for sensitive data
- Well-organized folder structure
apps/api/src/common/guards/role.guard.ts (2)
23-25: Verify default access behavior when no roles are specifiedThe guard currently allows access when no roles are specified. Confirm that this is the intended behavior, as it might lead to unsecured endpoints if roles are not properly set.
18-21: Confirm the retrieval of required rolesEnsure that the metadata key
'roles'is correctly set using a custom decorator or metadata assignment on route handlers and classes that utilize this guard.You can use the following script to list all handlers with the
'roles'metadata:✅ Verification successful
Required roles retrieval confirmed.
The
@Roles(UserRoles.ADMIN)decorator is correctly applied to the relevant route handlers in:
apps/api/src/modules/providers/providers.resolver.tsapps/api/src/modules/applications/applications.resolver.ts🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all methods with 'roles' metadata in the project. # Search for the '@Roles' decorator usage rg --type ts '@Roles\(' -A 2 src/Length of output: 80
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all methods with 'roles' metadata in the project. # Search for the '@Roles' decorator usage across the entire repository rg --type ts '@Roles\(' -A 2Length of output: 560
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract all roles assigned via the '@Roles' decorator in the project. # Search for the '@Roles(UserRoles.<ROLE>)' pattern and extract the role names rg --type ts '@Roles\(UserRoles\.(\w+)\)' -o --only-matching | grep -o 'UserRoles\.\w\+' | awk -F. '{print $2}' | sort | uniqLength of output: 133
kshitij-k-osmosys
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
apps/api/OsmoX.postman_collection.json (5)
3279-3283: Comprehensive authentication testing with room for improvementThe authentication-related requests in the collection are well-designed and cover essential scenarios. However, there's a minor inconsistency in the error handling tests:
pm.test("message: Forbidden resource", function () { var jsonData = pm.response.json(); pm.expect(jsonData).to.have.property("data"); pm.expect(jsonData).to.have.property("errors").to.be.an("array"); pm.expect(jsonData.errors[0]).to.have.property("message", "Forbidden resource"); });This test is repeated in multiple places with slight variations. To improve maintainability and consistency, consider extracting this common test into a reusable function.
Line range hint
1-4329: Comprehensive notification testing across multiple channelsThe collection includes a wide range of notification-related requests, covering various channels such as SMTP, Mailgun, WhatsApp, SMS, and more. Key points:
- Well-organized structure with separate folders for each notification type
- Consistent use of x-api-key header for authentication
- Thorough error scenario coverage (invalid API keys, missing fields, mismatched channel types)
- Detailed test scripts validating response structure and specific fields
To further enhance the collection, consider adding a test for rate limiting or throttling, if applicable to the API. This would help ensure the API behaves correctly under high load scenarios.
Line range hint
1-4329: Well-structured application and provider management requestsThe collection includes comprehensive requests for managing applications and providers:
- Separate folders for listing and creating applications and providers
- Both query (GET) and mutation (POST) operations are covered
- Error scenarios for non-admin users and bad requests are included
- Consistent use of GraphQL queries and mutations
To improve the collection further, consider adding requests for updating and deleting applications and providers if these operations are supported by the API. This would complete the CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) cycle for these entities.
Line range hint
1-4329: Solid coverage of webhook and server key operationsThe collection includes well-structured requests for webhook registration and server key generation:
- Webhook registration covers success and error scenarios (existing provider, unknown provider)
- Server key generation includes success and error cases
- Test scripts validate response structures and error messages
To enhance this section, consider adding the following:
- A request for listing registered webhooks, if supported by the API
- A request for revoking or deleting server keys
- A request for refreshing or updating existing webhooks
These additions would provide a more complete set of operations for webhook and key management.
Line range hint
1-4329: Excellent Postman collection with room for minor enhancementsOverall, the OsmoX.postman_collection.json file presents a high-quality, comprehensive Postman collection for testing the OsmoX API. Key strengths include:
- Wide coverage of API functionalities (authentication, notifications, applications, providers, webhooks, and server keys)
- Consistent use of test scripts for validating responses
- Thorough representation of both success and error scenarios
- Well-structured organization with separate folders for different functionalities
To further improve this already solid collection, consider:
- Implementing reusable test functions for common assertions
- Adding rate limiting/throttling tests for the notification endpoints
- Including update and delete operations for applications and providers
- Expanding webhook and server key management with additional operations (list, revoke, refresh)
- Ensuring all environment variables are properly documented
These enhancements would elevate the collection from excellent to outstanding, providing even more comprehensive API testing and documentation capabilities.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/api/OsmoX-API.postman_collection.json (3 hunks)
- apps/api/OsmoX.postman_collection.json (12 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/api/OsmoX-API.postman_collection.json
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/api/OsmoX.postman_collection.json (1)
Line range hint
1-4329: Well-structured and comprehensive Postman collectionThe OsmoX.postman_collection.json file presents a well-organized and thorough Postman collection for testing the OsmoX API. It includes:
- Separate folders for different types of notifications and functionalities
- Comprehensive test coverage with success and error scenarios
- Proper use of environment variables for dynamic values
- Consistent structure across different requests
This collection will be valuable for API testing and documentation purposes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
apps/api/src/modules/applications/applications.resolver.ts (3)
9-11: LGTM! Role-based access control implemented correctly.The addition of
Roles,RolesGuard, andUserRolesimports, along with the@Roles(UserRoles.ADMIN)and@UseGuards(GqlAuthGuard, RolesGuard)decorators, effectively implements role-based access control for theApplicationsResolverclass. This aligns well with the PR objectives.Consider grouping related imports together for better readability:
import { UseGuards } from '@nestjs/common'; import { Args, Context, Mutation, Resolver, Query } from '@nestjs/graphql'; import { Roles } from 'src/common/decorators/roles.decorator'; import { GqlAuthGuard } from 'src/common/guards/api-key/gql-auth.guard'; import { RolesGuard } from 'src/common/guards/role.guard'; import { UserRoles } from 'src/common/constants/database'; // ... other importsAlso applies to: 14-15
24-25: LGTM! Simplified user ID extraction.The changes to the
createApplicationmethod effectively simplify the user ID extraction process by directly accessingcontext.req.userId. This aligns with the PR objectives and improves code readability.Consider adding a null check for
context.req.userIdto handle potential edge cases:const requestUserId: number = context.req.userId; if (!requestUserId) { throw new Error('User ID not found in request context'); } return await this.applicationsService.createApplication(createApplicationInput, requestUserId);
Line range hint
1-34: Overall, excellent implementation of role-based access control and code simplification.The changes in this file successfully implement role-based access control for the
ApplicationsResolverclass and simplify the method implementations. Key improvements include:
- Addition of
@Roles(UserRoles.ADMIN)decorator to restrict access to admin users.- Implementation of
RolesGuardalongsideGqlAuthGuardfor comprehensive authorization.- Simplification of the
createApplicationmethod by directly usingcontext.req.userId.- Streamlining of the
findAllmethod by removing unnecessary context parameters.These changes align well with the PR objectives and contribute to improved security and code maintainability.
Consider documenting the role-based access control implementation in the project's architecture documentation to ensure that other developers understand and follow this pattern in future resolver implementations.
apps/api/src/modules/applications/applications.service.ts (2)
35-40: Improved createApplication implementationThe updated implementation correctly uses
getUserEntryFromContextto retrieve user information and creates a newApplicationobject with the authenticated user's ID. This change enhances security and aligns with the PR objectives.However, consider adding error handling for cases where
getUserEntryFromContextmight throw an exception:Consider wrapping the implementation in a try-catch block to handle potential errors:
try { const userEntryFromContext = await this.getUserEntryFromContext(requestUserId); const newApplicationObject = new Application({ name: applicationInput.name, userId: userEntryFromContext.userId, }); const application = this.applicationsRepository.create(newApplicationObject); return this.applicationsRepository.save(application); } catch (error) { // Log the error console.error('Error creating application:', error); throw new Error('Failed to create application'); }This addition will provide better error handling and logging for troubleshooting purposes.
46-59: New getUserEntryFromContext method implementationThe new
getUserEntryFromContextmethod effectively replaces the previouscheckAdminUsermethod, aligning with the PR objective of implementing role guards for API access. It correctly retrieves the user entry and throws anUnauthorizedExceptionif the user is not found.Remove the redundant catch clause as suggested by the static analysis tool:
async getUserEntryFromContext(requestUserId: number): Promise<User> { // Find the related user entry using the user ID from the token const userEntry = await this.usersService.findByUserId(requestUserId); if (!userEntry) { throw new UnauthorizedException('User not found'); } return userEntry; }This change simplifies the method without altering its functionality.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 57-57: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/api/src/modules/applications/applications.resolver.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/api/src/modules/applications/applications.service.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
apps/api/src/modules/applications/applications.service.ts
[error] 57-57: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apps/api/src/modules/applications/applications.resolver.ts (1)
28-33: LGTM! SimplifiedfindAllmethod.The removal of the
@Context()parameter and the simplification of thegetAllApplicationsservice method call improve code clarity and align with the PR objectives.Please verify that the
getAllApplicationsmethod in theApplicationsServicehas been updated to no longer require a user ID or authorization header. Run the following script to check the method signature:apps/api/src/modules/applications/applications.service.ts (3)
7-7: Import changes align with code modificationsThe addition of
StatusandUserimports, along with the removal ofUserRolesandJwtServiceimports, correctly reflects the changes in the service implementation. These modifications support the transition from role-based access control to direct user validation.Also applies to: 11-11
33-34: Improved method signature for createApplicationThe updated method signature now correctly accepts
requestUserId: numberinstead ofauthorizationHeader: Request. This change:
- Aligns with the PR objective of retrieving the user ID from the authentication token.
- Addresses the potential bug raised in a previous review comment about incorrect parameter type.
- Follows the suggestion to obtain user data from the request context.
These modifications enhance the security and correctness of the application creation process.
61-61: Simplified getAllApplications method signatureThe removal of the
authorizationHeaderparameter from thegetAllApplicationsmethod signature aligns with the PR objective of updating the functionality to retrieve user information from the authentication context rather than passing it explicitly.However, the removal of this parameter also suggests that role-based access control for this method has been removed. Please clarify if this is intentional and if there are any other mechanisms in place to ensure proper access control for retrieving all applications.
To verify the impact of this change, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any remaining role-based checks or other access control mechanisms related to the
getAllApplicationsmethod.
API PR Checklist
Pre-requisites
.env.examplefile with the required values as applicable.PR Details
PR details have been updated as per the given format (see below)
feat: add admin login endpoint)Additional Information
ready for reviewshould be added if the PR is ready to be reviewed)Note: Reviewer should ensure that the checklist and description have been populated and followed correctly, and the PR should be merged only after resolving all conversations and verifying that CI checks pass.
Description:
Update
Create Applicationto get user id from auth token & Add Roles guard for APIRelated changes:
Create Applicationto not use auth token and use request context instead to fetch useridScreenshots:
Response for non admin user
Query request and response:
New cURL for
create applicationResponse
{ "errors": [ { "message": "Forbidden resource", "locations": [ { "line": 2, "column": 5 } ], "path": [ "application" ], "extensions": { "code": "FORBIDDEN", "stacktrace": [ "ForbiddenException: Forbidden resource", " at canActivateFn (/home/work/osmosys-repos/osmo-x/apps/api/node_modules/@nestjs/core/helpers/external-context-creator.js:157:23)", " at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)", " at async target (/home/work/osmosys-repos/osmo-x/apps/api/node_modules/@nestjs/core/helpers/external-context-creator.js:73:31)", " at async Object.application (/home/work/osmosys-repos/osmo-x/apps/api/node_modules/@nestjs/core/helpers/external-proxy.js:9:24)" ], "originalError": { "message": "Forbidden resource", "error": "Forbidden", "statusCode": 403 } } } ], "data": null }Documentation changes:
api-documentation.mdto not use userIDTest suite/unit testing output:
NA
Pending actions:
NA
Additional notes:
NA
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Improvements
userIdfield.