Error handling #46
Error handling #46
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@JarbasAl has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 24 minutes and 46 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications across several files in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
ovos_padatious/training_manager.py (1)
83-88: Specify the exception type in the try-except block.The error handling is good, but using a bare
exceptis not recommended as it catches all exceptions, including keyboard interrupts and system exits.Apply this diff to specify the expected exceptions:
- try: # .net file renamed/deleted for some reason + try: # .net file renamed/deleted for some reason LOG.debug(f"Loading '{name}' from intent cache") self.objects.append(self.cls.from_file(name=name, folder=self.cache)) - except: + except (FileNotFoundError, RuntimeError) as e: LOG.debug(f"Regenerating cache for intent: {name}")🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
86-86: Do not use bare
except(E722)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
ovos_padatious/intent.py(1 hunks)ovos_padatious/intent_manager.py(1 hunks)ovos_padatious/opm.py(2 hunks)ovos_padatious/pos_intent.py(1 hunks)ovos_padatious/simple_intent.py(4 hunks)ovos_padatious/trainable.py(1 hunks)ovos_padatious/training_manager.py(2 hunks)
👮 Files not reviewed due to content moderation or server errors (3)
- ovos_padatious/simple_intent.py
- ovos_padatious/training_manager.py
- ovos_padatious/opm.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
ovos_padatious/intent_manager.py
57-57: Do not use bare except
(E722)
ovos_padatious/training_manager.py
86-86: Do not use bare except
(E722)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Run UnitTests
ovos_padatious/simple_intent.py
[error] 77-77: Not enough samples to learn intent: pos 2 / neg 0
🔇 Additional comments (22)
ovos_padatious/trainable.py (1)
36-36: LGTM! Good addition of return type annotation.Adding the return type annotation to the abstract
trainmethod enforces a consistent error handling pattern across all implementing classes.ovos_padatious/intent_manager.py (1)
51-52: LGTM! Good handling of empty case.Early return for empty objects improves efficiency and error handling.
ovos_padatious/simple_intent.py (10)
Line range hint
66-78: LGTM! Improved error handling for insufficient training samples.The changes enhance robustness by:
- Adding a return type annotation for better type safety.
- Adding error handling to prevent training with insufficient samples.
- Providing clear error messages in the logs.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Run UnitTests
[error] 77-77: Not enough samples to learn intent: pos 2 / neg 0
137-140: LGTM! Added error handling and file extension validation.The changes improve robustness by:
- Checking if the neural network is trained before saving.
- Ensuring consistent file naming by appending
.intentextension if missing.
146-149: LGTM! Added file existence check and extension validation.The changes enhance robustness by:
- Ensuring consistent file naming by appending
.intentextension if missing.- Checking if the neural network file exists before loading.
137-140: LGTM! Added validation before saving the intent.The changes improve error handling by:
- Validating that the neural network is trained before saving.
- Ensuring the correct file extension for consistency.
146-149: LGTM! Added validation before loading the intent.The changes improve error handling by:
- Ensuring the correct file extension for consistency.
- Validating that the neural network file exists before loading.
Line range hint
66-78: LGTM! Improved error handling for insufficient training samples.The changes enhance error handling by validating the presence of positive and negative samples before training. The error message is clear and helpful.
Run the following script to verify the error handling:
✅ Verification successful
Error handling for insufficient training samples is properly implemented
The verification confirms that:
- The error handling is unique to SimpleIntent.train() and appropriate for its specific validation case
- It integrates well with the broader error handling strategy in the training pipeline
- Error messages are clear and provide sufficient context for debugging
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify error handling for insufficient training samples. # Test: Search for error handling in training. Expect: Error message for insufficient samples. rg -A 5 $'not enough samples to learn intent'Length of output: 460
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other training-related error handling patterns rg -B 2 -A 2 "LOG.error.*train" # Search for similar validation patterns ast-grep --pattern 'if not $_ or not $_: $$$ return False'Length of output: 1163
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Run UnitTests
[error] 77-77: Not enough samples to learn intent: pos 2 / neg 0
66-66: LGTM! Improved error handling for insufficient training samples.The addition of the return type annotation and error handling for insufficient training samples is a good improvement. The error message is clear and helpful for debugging.
Also applies to: 76-78
134-134: LGTM! Added explicit success return value.The explicit return of
Trueafter successful training completes the boolean return type contract.
137-140: LGTM! Added error handling for untrained intents and path normalization.Good improvements:
- Prevents saving untrained intents, which could lead to runtime issues.
- Ensures consistent file extensions for intent files.
146-149: LGTM! Added error handling and path normalization in from_file method.Good improvements that mirror the changes in the
savemethod:
- Ensures consistent file extensions.
- Prevents loading untrained intents.
ovos_padatious/training_manager.py (6)
36-41: LGTM! Added error handling for training failures.The changes improve robustness by:
- Checking the training result before saving to cache.
- Adding debug messages for both success and failure cases.
77-81: LGTM! Added hash file check for cache invalidation.The changes improve robustness by ensuring training is performed when the hash file is missing.
36-41: LGTM! Added error handling for training failures.The changes improve error handling by:
- Checking the return value from
obj.train(data).- Adding debug logging for training failures.
104-109: LGTM! Added proper error handling for cache loading failures.The changes improve error handling by:
- Using a try-except block with proper exception handling.
- Logging the error message with exception details.
36-41: LGTM! Added error handling and logging for training outcomes.Good improvements:
- Checks training success before saving to cache.
- Adds debug logging for both success and failure cases.
102-112: LGTM! Added proper error handling for cache loading.Good improvements:
- Specific exception handling with error logging.
- Clear debug messages for training queue.
ovos_padatious/opm.py (4)
261-261: LGTM! Improved engine class initialization.The changes enhance flexibility and transparency by:
- Making the engine class optional.
- Determining the engine class based on configuration.
- Adding a log message to indicate which engine class is being used.
Also applies to: 276-277
261-261: LGTM! Improved engine class initialization.The changes improve the code by:
- Making the engine class selection more flexible with a
Nonedefault.- Adding logging to track which engine class is being used.
Also applies to: 276-277
261-261: LGTM! Made engine class selection more flexible.Setting
engine_classdefault toNoneallows for dynamic selection based on configuration.
276-277: LGTM! Added transparent engine class selection.Good improvements:
- Clear logic for engine class selection based on configuration.
- Helpful logging to show which engine class is being used.
| if len(self.objects) == 1: | ||
| try: | ||
| match = self.objects[0].match(sent, entity_manager).detokenize() | ||
| return [match] | ||
| except: | ||
| return [] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Specify the exception type instead of using bare except.
The bare except clause could mask important errors. Consider catching specific exceptions that you expect might occur during matching.
Apply this diff to improve error handling:
if len(self.objects) == 1:
try:
match = self.objects[0].match(sent, entity_manager).detokenize()
return [match]
- except:
+ except Exception as e:
+ LOG.error(f"Error matching single intent: {e}")
return []Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
57-57: Do not use bare except
(E722)
ovos_padatious/pos_intent.py
Outdated
| def train(self, train_data) -> bool: | ||
| for i in self.edges: | ||
| i.train(train_data) | ||
| return True |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding actual error handling.
The method always returns True regardless of whether training was successful. Consider adding error handling to accurately reflect the training outcome.
Apply this diff to improve error handling:
def train(self, train_data) -> bool:
- for i in self.edges:
- i.train(train_data)
- return True
+ try:
+ for i in self.edges:
+ i.train(train_data)
+ return True
+ except Exception as e:
+ LOG.error(f"Failed to train edges: {e}")
+ return FalseCommittable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
ovos_padatious/intent.py
Outdated
| success = self.simple_intent.train(train_data) | ||
| for i in self.pos_intents: | ||
| i.train(train_data) | ||
| return success |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider handling errors from pos_intents training.
The return value only reflects the success of simple_intent.train() but ignores potential failures in training pos_intents.
Apply this diff to improve error handling:
success = self.simple_intent.train(train_data)
+ if not success:
+ return False
+
+ pos_success = True
for i in self.pos_intents:
- i.train(train_data)
+ try:
+ if not i.train(train_data):
+ pos_success = False
+ break
+ except Exception as e:
+ LOG.error(f"Failed to train pos_intent: {e}")
+ pos_success = False
+ break
- return success
+ return success and pos_success📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| success = self.simple_intent.train(train_data) | |
| for i in self.pos_intents: | |
| i.train(train_data) | |
| return success | |
| success = self.simple_intent.train(train_data) | |
| if not success: | |
| return False | |
| pos_success = True | |
| for i in self.pos_intents: | |
| try: | |
| if not i.train(train_data): | |
| pos_success = False | |
| break | |
| except Exception as e: | |
| LOG.error(f"Failed to train pos_intent: {e}") | |
| pos_success = False | |
| break | |
| return success and pos_success |
ovos_padatious/training_manager.py
Outdated
| try: # .net file renamed/deleted for some reason | ||
| LOG.debug(f"Loading '{name}' from intent cache") | ||
| self.objects.append(self.cls.from_file(name=name, folder=self.cache)) | ||
| except: | ||
| LOG.debug(f"Regenerating cache for intent: {name}") | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace bare except with specific exception types.
The bare except clause can mask important errors. Consider catching specific exceptions like FileNotFoundError or RuntimeError.
Apply this diff to improve error handling:
- try: # .net file renamed/deleted for some reason
- LOG.debug(f"Loading '{name}' from intent cache")
- self.objects.append(self.cls.from_file(name=name, folder=self.cache))
- except:
- LOG.debug(f"Regenerating cache for intent: {name}")
+ try: # .net file renamed/deleted for some reason
+ LOG.debug(f"Loading '{name}' from intent cache")
+ self.objects.append(self.cls.from_file(name=name, folder=self.cache))
+ except (FileNotFoundError, RuntimeError) as e:
+ LOG.debug(f"Regenerating cache for intent: {name} - {str(e)}")📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| try: # .net file renamed/deleted for some reason | |
| LOG.debug(f"Loading '{name}' from intent cache") | |
| self.objects.append(self.cls.from_file(name=name, folder=self.cache)) | |
| except: | |
| LOG.debug(f"Regenerating cache for intent: {name}") | |
| try: # .net file renamed/deleted for some reason | |
| LOG.debug(f"Loading '{name}' from intent cache") | |
| self.objects.append(self.cls.from_file(name=name, folder=self.cache)) | |
| except (FileNotFoundError, RuntimeError) as e: | |
| LOG.debug(f"Regenerating cache for intent: {name} - {str(e)}") |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
86-86: Do not use bare except
(E722)
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Specify the exception type instead of using a bare except.
The bare except clause can hide errors and make debugging difficult.
Apply this diff to improve error handling:
- try: # .net file renamed/deleted for some reason
- LOG.debug(f"Loading '{name}' from intent cache")
- self.objects.append(self.cls.from_file(name=name, folder=self.cache))
- except:
- LOG.debug(f"Regenerating cache for intent: {name}")
+ try: # .net file renamed/deleted for some reason
+ LOG.debug(f"Loading '{name}' from intent cache")
+ self.objects.append(self.cls.from_file(name=name, folder=self.cache))
+ except (FileNotFoundError, RuntimeError) as e:
+ LOG.debug(f"Regenerating cache for intent: {name} - {str(e)}")📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| try: # .net file renamed/deleted for some reason | |
| LOG.debug(f"Loading '{name}' from intent cache") | |
| self.objects.append(self.cls.from_file(name=name, folder=self.cache)) | |
| except: | |
| LOG.debug(f"Regenerating cache for intent: {name}") | |
| try: # .net file renamed/deleted for some reason | |
| LOG.debug(f"Loading '{name}' from intent cache") | |
| self.objects.append(self.cls.from_file(name=name, folder=self.cache)) | |
| except (FileNotFoundError, RuntimeError) as e: | |
| LOG.debug(f"Regenerating cache for intent: {name} - {str(e)}") |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
86-86: Do not use bare except
(E722)
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
Bug Fixes
Improvements
Performance