-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 407
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support static-challenge "concat" option #701
Merged
+17
−5
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not sure I understand this code here - the
GetDlgItemTextW()
seems clear to me ("if we have CONCAT, read the text field from the window and put it after the existing content inpassword
= concat).What I'm unclear on is the
SetDlgItemTextW()
part - so we put the concatenated password into theID_EDT_AUTH_PASS
field of the window, and a full set ofx
(of length password+challenge) into theID_EDT_AUTH_CHALLENGE
field?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess that's because later in
ManagementCommandFromInput()
we get the value of password+auth_challenge fromID_EDT_AUTH_PASS
field - so we need that field to contain those concatenated values. And we do erase the content inID_EDT_AUTH_CHALLENGE
becauseManagementCommandFromInput()
does it only forID_EDT_AUTH_PASS
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, as lev said. This allows one to reuse the password submission code by re-writing the password filed with password+OTP. A less "hacky" way would be to add a new function "ManagementComamndFromTwoInputs()" duplicating most of "ManagementCommandFromInput()"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, thanks. I only half-understood this - I saw "ok, it's appending the CR to the password, to be used later down" and then totally overlooked that
password[]
is actually x-ed out right after :-) - makes sense.LGTM.