Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve documentation #29

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 13, 2023
Merged

Improve documentation #29

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 13, 2023

Conversation

Ndpnt
Copy link
Member

@Ndpnt Ndpnt commented Dec 13, 2023

No description provided.

@Ndpnt Ndpnt requested a review from MattiSG December 13, 2023 14:17
README.md Outdated
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ Available variables are listed below, along with default values:
| --- | --- | --- |
| `ota_federated_api_repo` | Repository URL of the federated API code | `https://github.com/OpenTermsArchive/federated-api.git` |
| `ota_federated_api_directory` | Path of the directory where the code will be deployed on the server | `federated-api` |
| `ota_federated_api_branch` | Git branch of the federated API repository to use | `main` |
| `ota_federated_api_branch` | Git branch or tag of the federated API repository to use | `main` |
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
| `ota_federated_api_branch` | Git branch or tag of the federated API repository to use | `main` |
| `ota_federated_api_branch` | [Git tree-ish](https://git-scm.com/docs/gitglossary#Documentation/gitglossary.txt-aiddeftree-ishatree-ishalsotreeish) (branch name, tag name…) of the federated API repository to use | `main` |

@Ndpnt Ndpnt merged commit 866d3cf into main Dec 13, 2023
1 check failed
@Ndpnt Ndpnt deleted the improve-doc branch December 13, 2023 15:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants