Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make a class equivalent #1577 #1618

Conversation

viktorwichern
Copy link
Contributor

I made secondary energy carrier production an equivalent class by changing secondary energy production to be equivalent to a production and 'has physical output' some 'secondary energy carrier'

Type of change (CHANGELOG.md)

Updated

  • Updated a definition #

Workflow checklist

Automation

Closes #1577

PR-Assignee

Reviewer

  • 🐙 Follow the Reviewer Guide
  • 🐙 Provided feedback and show sufficient appreciation for the work done

@github-actions github-actions bot added the oeo-physical changes the oeo-physical module label Jul 11, 2023
@viktorwichern viktorwichern added the [B] restructure Restructuring existing parts of the ontology label Jul 11, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the oeo-shared changes the oeo-shared module label Jul 11, 2023
@viktorwichern viktorwichern self-assigned this Jul 11, 2023
@viktorwichern viktorwichern marked this pull request as ready for review July 11, 2023 20:05
@viktorwichern
Copy link
Contributor Author

Has already been solved in PR #1619.

@stap-m stap-m deleted the feature-1577-make-secondary-energy-carrier-production-equivalent-class branch October 25, 2023 12:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
[B] restructure Restructuring existing parts of the ontology oeo-physical changes the oeo-physical module oeo-shared changes the oeo-shared module
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make secondary energy carrier production an equivalent class
1 participant