-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
specific energy transformations #1527 #1599
Conversation
To proceed, some open questions have to be answered in the issue. |
Ok, this PR is already huge. I will add further things later, once the open questens are discussed and open it for review now. |
This will take a while to review, I will try to make some time for it tomorrow. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Moved without comment: OEO_00000300, OEO_00020257, OEO_00020258, OEO_00020259, OEO_00020260.
Is electrical energy transfer
equivalent to electricity generation process
? Because this is being inferred by the reasoner.
Maybe we are missing a constraint there.
See #1527 (comment) . I think we'll have to rediscuss the transfer hierarchy anyway. |
Reset to draft as this needs a new start |
This is outdated. I close this PR now. |
Summary of the discussion
Relations are moved to oeo-shared and classes are made equivalent classes.
TODO:
Type of change (CHANGELOG.md)
Updated
Workflow checklist
Automation
Closes #1527
PR-Assignee
term tracker item
Reviewer