Merge pull request #4 from OpenDevicePartnership/jeffglaum/release-docs

Draft initial project docs

CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+# Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct
+
+## Our Pledge
+
+We as members, contributors, and leaders pledge to make participation in our
+community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body
+size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender
+identity and expression, level of experience, education, socio-economic status,
+nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual
+identity and orientation.
+
+We pledge to act and interact in ways that contribute to an open, welcoming,
+diverse, inclusive, and healthy community.
+
+## Our Standards
+
+Examples of behavior that contributes to a positive environment for our
+community include:
+
+* Demonstrating empathy and kindness toward other people
+* Being respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences
+* Giving and gracefully accepting constructive feedback
+* Accepting responsibility and apologizing to those affected by our mistakes,
+  and learning from the experience
+* Focusing on what is best not just for us as individuals, but for the overall
+  community
+
+Examples of unacceptable behavior include:
+
+* The use of sexualized language or imagery, and sexual attention or advances of
+  any kind
+* Trolling, insulting or derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
+* Public or private harassment
+* Publishing others' private information, such as a physical or email address,
+  without their explicit permission
+* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
+  professional setting
+
+## Enforcement Responsibilities
+
+Community leaders are responsible for clarifying and enforcing our standards of
+acceptable behavior and will take appropriate and fair corrective action in
+response to any behavior that they deem inappropriate, threatening, offensive,
+or harmful.
+
+Community leaders have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject
+comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are
+not aligned to this Code of Conduct, and will communicate reasons for moderation
+decisions when appropriate.
+
+## Scope
+
+This Code of Conduct applies within all community spaces, and also applies when
+an individual is officially representing the community in public spaces.
+Examples of representing our community include using an official e-mail address,
+posting via an official social media account, or acting as an appointed
+representative at an online or offline event.
+
+## Enforcement
+
+Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
+reported to the community leaders responsible for enforcement at
+[email protected].
+All complaints will be reviewed and investigated promptly and fairly.
+
+All community leaders are obligated to respect the privacy and security of the
+reporter of any incident.
+
+## Enforcement Guidelines
+
+Community leaders will follow these Community Impact Guidelines in determining
+the consequences for any action they deem in violation of this Code of Conduct:
+
+### 1. Correction
+
+**Community Impact**: Use of inappropriate language or other behavior deemed
+unprofessional or unwelcome in the community.
+
+**Consequence**: A private, written warning from community leaders, providing
+clarity around the nature of the violation and an explanation of why the
+behavior was inappropriate. A public apology may be requested.
+
+### 2. Warning
+
+**Community Impact**: A violation through a single incident or series of
+actions.
+
+**Consequence**: A warning with consequences for continued behavior. No
+interaction with the people involved, including unsolicited interaction with
+those enforcing the Code of Conduct, for a specified period of time. This
+includes avoiding interactions in community spaces as well as external channels
+like social media. Violating these terms may lead to a temporary or permanent
+ban.
+
+### 3. Temporary Ban
+
+**Community Impact**: A serious violation of community standards, including
+sustained inappropriate behavior.
+
+**Consequence**: A temporary ban from any sort of interaction or public
+communication with the community for a specified period of time. No public or
+private interaction with the people involved, including unsolicited interaction
+with those enforcing the Code of Conduct, is allowed during this period.
+Violating these terms may lead to a permanent ban.
+
+### 4. Permanent Ban
+
+**Community Impact**: Demonstrating a pattern of violation of community
+standards, including sustained inappropriate behavior, harassment of an
+individual, or aggression toward or disparagement of classes of individuals.
+
+**Consequence**: A permanent ban from any sort of public interaction within the
+community.
+
+## Attribution
+
+This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage],
+version 2.1, available at
+[https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/1/code_of_conduct.html][v2.1].
+
+Community Impact Guidelines were inspired by
+[Mozilla's code of conduct enforcement ladder][Mozilla CoC].
+
+For answers to common questions about this code of conduct, see the FAQ at
+[https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq][FAQ]. Translations are available at
+[https://www.contributor-covenant.org/translations][translations].
+
+[homepage]: https://www.contributor-covenant.org
+[v2.1]: https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/1/code_of_conduct.html
+[Mozilla CoC]: https://github.com/mozilla/diversity
+[FAQ]: https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq
+[translations]: https://www.contributor-covenant.org/translations

CONTRIBUTING.md

@@ -1,18 +1,15 @@
-# Contribution Guideline
+# Contributing to Open Device Partnership
 
-* Use meaningful commit messages. See [this blogpost](http://tbaggery.com/2008/04/19/a-note-about-git-commit-messages.html)
+The Open Device Partnership project welcomes your suggestions and contributions! Before opening your first issue or pull request, please review our
+[Code of Conduct](CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md) to understand how our community interacts in an inclusive and respectful manner.
 
-# PR Etiquette
+## Contribution Licensing
 
-* Create a draft PR first
-* Make sure that your branch has `.github` folder and all the code linting/sanity check workflows are passing in your draft PR before sending it out to code reviewers.
+Most of our code is distributed under the terms of the [MIT license](LICENSE), and when you contribute code that you wrote to our repositories,
+you agree that you are contributing under those same terms. In addition, by submitting your contributions you are indicating that
+you have the right to submit those contributions under those terms.
 
-# Clean Commit History
+## Other Contribution Information
 
-We disabled squashing of commit and would like to maintain a clean commit history. So please reorganize your commits with the following items:
-  * Each commit builds successfully without warning from `rustc` or `clippy`
-  * Miscellaneous commits to fix typos + formatting are squashed
-
-# Regressions
-
-When reporting a regression, please ensure that you use `git bisect` to find the first offending commit, as that will help us finding the culprit a lot faster.
+If you wish to contribute code or documentation authored by others, or using the terms of any other license, please indicate that clearly in your
+pull request so that the project team can discuss the situation with you.

Cargo.toml

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 [package]
 name = "pcal6416a"
 version = "0.1.0"
-repository = "https://github.com/pop-project/pcal6416a"
+repository = "https://github.com/OpenDevicePartnership/pcal6416a"
 license = "MIT"
 description = "Platform-agnostic Rust driver for the Texas Instruments BQ25773 battery charge controller."
 readme = "README.md"

LICENSE

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 MIT License
 
-Copyright (c) 2024 pop-project
+Copyright (c) 2025 Microsoft Corporation
 
 Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
 of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
@@ -18,4 +18,4 @@ FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
 AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
 LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
 OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
-SOFTWARE.
+SOFTWARE.

SECURITY.md

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+# Vulnerability Disclosure and Embargo Policy
+
+The Open Device Partnership project welcomes the responsible disclosure of vulnerabilities.
+
+## Initial Contact
+
+All security bugs in Open Device Partnership should be reported to the security team.
+To do so, please reach out in the form of a
+[Github Security Advisory](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/security-advisories/guidance-on-reporting-and-writing-information-about-vulnerabilities).
+
+You will be invited to join this private area to discuss specifics. Doing so
+allows us to start with a high level of confidentiality and relax it if the
+issue is less critical, moving to work on the fix in the open.
+
+Your initial contact will be acknowledged within 48 hours, and you’ll receive
+a more detailed response within 96 hours indicating the next steps in handling
+your report.
+
+After the initial reply to your report, the security team will endeavor to
+keep you informed of the progress being made towards a fix and full
+announcement. As recommended by
+[RFPolicy](https://dl.packetstormsecurity.net/papers/general/rfpolicy-2.0.txt),
+these updates will be sent at least every five working days.
+
+## Disclosure Policy
+
+The Open Device Partnership project has a 5 step disclosure process.
+
+1. Contact is established, a private channel created, and the security report
+   is received and is assigned a primary handler. This person will coordinate
+   the fix and release process.
+2. The problem is confirmed and a list of all affected versions is determined.
+   If an embargo is needed (see below), details of the embargo are decided.
+3. Code is audited to find any potential similar problems.
+4. Fixes are prepared for all releases which are still under maintenance. In
+   case of embargo, these fixes are not committed to the public repository but
+   rather held in a private fork pending the announcement.
+5. The changes are pushed to the public repository and new builds are deployed.
+
+This process can take some time, especially when coordination is required
+with maintainers of other projects. Every effort will be made to handle the bug
+in as timely a manner as possible, however it is important that we follow the
+release process above to ensure that the disclosure is handled in a consistent
+manner.
+
+## Embargoes
+
+While the Open Device Partnership project aims to follow the highest standards of
+transparency and openness, handling some security issues may pose such an
+immediate threat to various stakeholders and require coordination between
+various actors that it cannot be made immediately public.
+
+In this case, security issues will fall under an embargo.
+
+An embargo can be called for in various cases:
+
+- when disclosing the issue without simultaneously providing a mitigation
+  would seriously endanger users,
+- when producing a fix requires coordinating between multiple actors (such as
+  upstream or downstream/dependency projects), or simply
+- when proper analysis of the issue and its ramifications demands time.
+
+If we determine that an issue you report requires an embargo, we will discuss
+this with you and try to find a reasonable expiry date (aka “embargo
+completion date”), as well as who should be included in the list of
+need-to-know people.