Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[New model] Kermut #38

Open
wants to merge 19 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[New model] Kermut #38

wants to merge 19 commits into from

Conversation

petergroth
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi ProteinGym team!

We would like to submit our model, Kermut, to the supervised substitution benchmark leaderboards, where it achieves state-of-the-art performance across splits.

All code required to run the model has been added to proteingym/baselines/kermut and model details have been added to proteingym/constants.json. We have included a README with detailed instructions on how to access either raw or preprocessed data (recommended) and train/evaluate the model. Our data directory matches that of ProteinGym and should work seamlessly if scripts are called from the ProteinGym root directory. Aggregated results across assays can be found in kermut/results/summary, while the per-variant predictions can be accessed via the README.

To reproduce results, the preprocessed data (e.g., precomputed embeddings) can be downloaded and unzipped as described, after which either example_scripts/benchmark_single_dataset.sh or example_scripts/benchmark_all_datasets.sh can be run. We have a script to merge all individual results (src/results/merge_score_files.py), the output of which can be used directly with performance_DMS_supervised_benchmarks.py. Note that our environment has additional dependencies, all of which are listed in kermut/environment.yaml.

The results in results/summary are from the updated CV splits (see issue), while results for the old splits which can be directly compared to the current leaderboard can be found in results/summary_old.

Thank you for your efforts!

Peter

@petergroth
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Code has been streamlined and refactored for easier use.

@petergroth petergroth marked this pull request as draft September 24, 2024 17:38
@petergroth petergroth marked this pull request as ready for review September 24, 2024 18:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants