Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[feature] SparkDataFrame / SparkConnectDataFrame #59

Closed

Conversation

maxim-mityutko
Copy link
Contributor

@maxim-mityutko maxim-mityutko commented Sep 3, 2024

Description

pyspark.sql.DataFrame / pyspark.sql.connect.DataFrame are accepted as a valid input / output for Spark related workloads.

Related Issue

#62

Motivation and Context

See the description of the #62

How Has This Been Tested?

Unit tests / executed in Serverless compute

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@maxim-mityutko maxim-mityutko marked this pull request as ready for review September 9, 2024 10:15
@maxim-mityutko maxim-mityutko requested a review from a team as a code owner September 9, 2024 10:15
@mikita-sakalouski
Copy link
Contributor

Please have a look at changes in this commit: 2e86208#diff-5a83c2ed86f340ff6a3110cd2a8a71ddd29947487301ad7941e4d99fbc8def6cR12

@dannymeijer dannymeijer changed the base branch from main to 33-feature-ensure-that-we-can-support-dbr-143lts September 10, 2024 09:11
@dannymeijer dannymeijer added this to the 0.9.0 milestone Oct 2, 2024
Base automatically changed from 33-feature-ensure-that-we-can-support-dbr-143lts to release/0.9 October 29, 2024 21:14
@dannymeijer
Copy link
Member

Closed in favor of #63

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants