Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(docker-chaosnet): release snapshot docker build failed CI #1847

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 16, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Unique-Divine
Copy link
Member

@Unique-Divine Unique-Divine commented Apr 16, 2024

Purpose / Abstract

The GitHub action that builds using chaosnet.Dockerfile failed even though the pull request passed all of its checks.

This PR is meant to include necessary changes for the docker build.

Local Testing

  • For Dockerfile:
docker build -t nibi-test .
  • For contrib/docker/chaosnet.Dockerfile:
docker build -t nibi-test-2 -f contrib/docker/chaosnet.Dockerfile .

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Enhanced GitHub Actions workflows to include go.mod and go.sum files in linting, integration tests, and unit tests triggers.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Addressed a CI build issue in the docker-chaosnet module as documented in the CHANGELOG.
  • Documentation

    • Updated CHANGELOG with recent fixes.
  • New Features

    • Modified Dockerfiles to better manage dependencies and project files within the containers.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 16, 2024

Walkthrough

This update enhances the workflow by broadening the trigger conditions for GitHub Actions, incorporating additional files like go.mod, go.sum, and specific Docker configurations. It also updates the Dockerfiles for better management of dependencies and project setup, ensuring a robust build and testing environment.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/...lint.yml Added **go.mod and **go.sum to paths for linting checks on push and pull_request events.
.github/workflows/...tests.yml Expanded paths to trigger integration and unit tests on pull requests to include **go.mod, **go.sum, and contrib/docker/ directory files.
Dockerfile, contrib/docker/...Dockerfile Updated Dockerfiles to handle project dependencies more effectively by adjusting how files like go.mod, go.sum, and geth are managed.
CHANGELOG.md Documented a fix related to the CI build process for the docker-chaosnet module.

Possibly related issues

  • NibiruChain/web-app#869: The changes in Dockerfiles and enhanced testing triggers could support the robustness and reliability goals for the chaosnet module as described in the issue.

Poem

🐇✨
In the land of code and docker files,
A rabbit hopped through digital aisles.
With a tweak here and a fix there,
Ensuring all workflows are beyond compare.
Celebrate each commit, merge, and pull,
In the garden of Git, life's never dull!
🌟🐰


Recent Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1a46a9b and 919b2e5.
Files selected for processing (6)
  • .github/workflows/golangci-lint.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/integration-tests.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/unit-tests.yml (1 hunks)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • contrib/docker/chaosnet.Dockerfile (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (9)
Dockerfile (2)

5-6: Ensure that the go.mod and go.sum files are up-to-date to avoid issues with dependencies during the Docker build process.


7-8: Copying geth to WORKDIR/geth is a good practice for organizing executable files separately, which can simplify path management in scripts and applications.

contrib/docker/chaosnet.Dockerfile (2)

5-6: Copying go.mod and go.sum directly to the WORKDIR ensures that dependency management is handled correctly during the Docker build, which is crucial for consistent builds.


10-11: Copying the rest of the project to the WORKDIR after setting up the environment ensures that all project files are available for subsequent build steps.

.github/workflows/integration-tests.yml (1)

9-9: Expanding the trigger paths to include **go.mod and **go.sum ensures that integration tests are run whenever there are changes to dependency files, which is crucial for catching issues early.

.github/workflows/unit-tests.yml (1)

5-5: Including contrib/docker/* in the paths that trigger unit tests ensures that changes to Docker configurations are also verified by unit tests, which is a good practice for maintaining robustness in Docker setups.

.github/workflows/golangci-lint.yml (1)

7-7: Adding **go.mod and **go.sum to the paths for both push and pull_request events ensures that linting checks are performed on these files when changes are made, which is essential for maintaining code quality.

Also applies to: 9-9

CHANGELOG.md (2)

66-66: Consider whether this entry should be categorized under "State Machine Breaking". If the change does not affect the state machine but rather fixes a CI build issue, it might be more appropriate under "Bug Fixes" or "CI".


66-66: The changelog entry is clear and follows the established format with a direct link to the pull request. Good job maintaining consistency.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Unique-Divine Unique-Divine marked this pull request as ready for review April 16, 2024 09:48
@Unique-Divine Unique-Divine requested a review from a team as a code owner April 16, 2024 09:48
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Comment on lines +7 to +8
# copy geth to WORKDIR/geth
COPY geth ./geth
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

Review Summary

The verification process aimed to ensure that the geth executable is correctly placed and has the necessary permissions set for execution within the Docker container. The script executed checked for the presence and executable permissions of files named geth across the repository.

Findings

The output from the script indicates mixed results:

  • Some instances of the geth file have executable permissions set.
  • Several instances of the geth file do not have executable permissions set.

This inconsistency suggests that while some geth files are prepared for execution, others are not, which could lead to issues depending on which file is being copied into the Docker container.

Action Required

Given the mixed permissions observed, it is recommended to ensure that the specific geth file intended for use in the Docker container has executable permissions set. This might involve setting the permissions explicitly in the Dockerfile or verifying that the correct file with the necessary permissions is being used.

Analysis chain

Ensure that the geth executable is correctly placed and has the necessary permissions set for execution within the Docker container.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the `geth` file exists and has execute permissions
fd 'geth' --exec bash -c 'if [ -x {} ]; then echo "Executable permission is set for geth."; else echo "Executable permission is NOT set for geth."; fi'

Length of output: 612

Copy link
Member

@k-yang k-yang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Both docker build commands worked on my platform (Mac M1)

@k-yang k-yang merged commit da22964 into main Apr 16, 2024
17 checks passed
@k-yang k-yang deleted the fix-build branch April 16, 2024 13:15
@k-yang k-yang restored the fix-build branch May 1, 2024 18:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: ✅ Completed
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants