You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
There is always room for improvement, but this is just one step to refactoring the current main scripts: scripts.js and lib-franklin.js (still a work in progress, but the current work can be added and retaken later to continue with the refactor)
Hello, I'm Franklin Bot and I will run some test suites that validate the page speed.
In case there are problems, just click the checkbox below to rerun the respective action.
Hello, I'm the AEM Code Sync Bot and I will run some test suites that validate the page speed.
In case there are problems, just click the checkbox below to rerun the respective action.
a colleague of my team reminded me that if Adobe updates lib-franklin, all changes in lib-franklin.js will be lost, so maybe it is better if in the changes that I made, we can revoke them, but not the ones in scripts.js, WDYT @tomasznetcentric
a colleague of my team reminded me that if Adobe updates lib-franklin, all changes in lib-franklin.js will be lost, so maybe it is better if in the changes that I made, we can revoke them, but not the ones in scripts.js, WDYT @tomasznetcentric
a colleague of my team reminded me that if Adobe updates lib-franklin, all changes in lib-franklin.js will be lost, so maybe it is better if in the changes that I made, we can revoke them, but not the ones in scripts.js, WDYT @tomasznetcentric
not necessarily, at that moment was a matter of seeing if the code could be improved and I started with the core scripts. but currently, there are enough open issues to work with more important than this one. WDYT?
a colleague of my team reminded me that if Adobe updates lib-franklin, all changes in lib-franklin.js will be lost, so maybe it is better if in the changes that I made, we can revoke them, but not the ones in scripts.js, WDYT @tomasznetcentric
not necessarily, at that moment was a matter of seeing if the code could be improved and I started with the core scripts. but currently, there are enough open issues to work with more important than this one. WDYT?
Just to clarify: lib-franklin.js will not be auto updated by Adobe, we always have to pull changes manually from the boilerplate if we want to update. Having that said we should avoid making changes which are not functional to minimise effort if we want to take over changes.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There is always room for improvement, but this is just one step to refactoring the current main scripts: scripts.js and lib-franklin.js (still a work in progress, but the current work can be added and retaken later to continue with the refactor)
Fix #281
Test URLs: