-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Linear with DID loop split #3650
Open
Priya2698
wants to merge
4
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
pm/linear_loop_split
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
!build |
Priya2698
requested review from
wujingyue,
samnordmann and
cowanmeg
and removed request for
cowanmeg and
samnordmann
December 28, 2024 06:10
wujingyue
approved these changes
Dec 29, 2024
Comment on lines
+127
to
+128
self.weight = self.define_tensor([d * e, e], contiguity=[True, True]) | ||
self.bias = self.define_tensor([d * e], contiguity=[True]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
self.weight = self.define_tensor([d * e, e], contiguity=[True, True]) | |
self.bias = self.define_tensor([d * e], contiguity=[True]) | |
self.weight = self.define_tensor([d * e, e], contiguity=True) | |
self.bias = self.define_tensor([d * e], contiguity=True) |
Also, a question for you: is contiguity=True necessary here? Is there a problem with non-contiguous inputs?
Comment on lines
+169
to
+171
expected_out_tensor = unsharded_out_tensor.view([b, s, d, e]).permute(2, 0, 1, 3)[ | ||
rank : rank + 1 | ||
] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we use shard_tensor here?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds a test case demonstrating DID loop split for linear.
The test does not require any changes to the
LinearOp::evaluate
method and works out of the box. DID split on logical domain continues to work for linear using the additional WARs present that squeeze/unsqueeze the DID dimension. Those WARs can be removed once we completely switch to representing device parallelism using allocation and loop domain.