-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Preserve multiple definitions of the same property in the same rule? #16
Comments
I fully understand your problem. I'm rewriting the parser in SAC-style. It will allow me to parse CSS into different object models, not just CSSOM. Like so: body { background-image: -moz-radial-gradient(center, #a8e936, #76a326); background-image: -webkit-gradient(radial, 50% 50%, 0, 50% 50%, 800, from(#a8e936), to(#76a326)); background-image: -webkit-radial-gradient(center, #a8e936, #76a326); } into { "cssRules": [ { "selectorText": "body", "style": { "0": { name: "background-image", value: "-moz-radial-gradient(center, #a8e936, #76a326)" }, "1": { name: "background-image", value: "-webkit-gradient(radial, 50% 50%, 0, 50% 50%, 800, from(#a8e936), to(#76a326))" }, "2": { name: "background-image", value: "-webkit-radial-gradient(center, #a8e936, #76a326);" }, "length": 3, "background-image": [0, 1, 2] } } ] } Stay tuned! |
Awesome :). That'd be exactly what I need! |
yes, i have the same problem. would be awesome to have this. |
I don't think I'll fix it soon. If you want it ASAP you could override CSSStyleDeclaration.prototype.setProperty. |
I ended up hacking the CSS parser to continue with a new rule (with an identical selector) if it sees a property redefinition. Seems like that preserves the semantics: assetgraph/assetgraph@9609d66...ee00c99#diff-0 (only the changes to Haven't looked into doing the opposite during serialization yet. |
serializes to
The downside is it changes amount of selectors. |
@NV: Since I wrote the previous message I've patched the serialization code to do the inverse: https://github.com/One-com/assetgraph/blob/master/lib/3rdparty/CSSOM/lib/CSSStyleSheet.js#L77-L91 So your example now serializes to one rule with a single selector :) Yes, it's still a hack, and in some corner cases it will collapse neighboring rules with the same selector that were separate originally, but the semantics are preserved and it seems to be adequate for my use case. |
+1 for fixing this, using papandreou fork for now. |
+1 vote |
@quaelin: In the mean time you can |
Thanks @papandreou, your fork is doing the trick. :) |
Ive been using papandreou fork for some time as well, works great - love OS this way :) |
i definitely need this too. do you have the SAC thing open-sourced anywhere? |
No, I still haven’t released it. |
i ended up just whipping up https://github.com/visionmedia/node-css since I don't (currently at least) need completely parsed selectors / values |
+1 for merging in the pull request |
This does not seem to have been merged yet. I tried using cssom-papandreou but that doesn't preserve multiple rules for same attribute. |
I also need this. https://github.com/papandreou/CSSOM/tree/cssom-papandreou has fixed it, but it does not have the latest version of cssom. So I created another fork: https://github.com/intesso/CSSOM and created a pull request: #53. |
Is there any fix or suggested work around to this yet? Thx! |
vote +1 , this is very important when i use flex. such as display:-webkit-box; |
@superlc I recommend using postcss instead, unless it's important to work with the CSSOM api. Postcss doesn't have this limitation. |
It's not uncommon for CSS authors to take advantage of the fact that a browser must ignore a CSS property in its entirety if a parse error or unsupported token is encountered in the value. For example:
If parsed and reserialized using CSSOM only the last of the three background-image properties will survive. In the project I'm working on it would be very desirable to be able to reconstruct the whole thing. I'm not sure if this falls within the scope of CSSOM -- but would it be possible to achieve that behavior somehow?
Best regards,
Papandreou
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: