-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 156
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add MIT yaw correction method #638
Conversation
@mhowlan3 this pull replaces the old one following updates to new turbine.py structure |
Hi all, In Munich we have recently published a preprint describing a model we have developed to predict the effect of yaw and tilt on power and thrust. We have also modeled the asymmetrical effect of inflow shear (that seem to favor positive yaw angles for maximum power). We have presented this briefly at WESC in Glasgow last May. The preprint is available here: https://wes.copernicus.org/preprints/wes-2023-133/ . We have also attempted an implementation into floris, with some modifications, available here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8388901 (main/figs_14_15/floris). The code can also be tested in a Jupyter notebook here: https://tinyurl.com/btcl-main , at (main/figs_14_15/fig14.ipynb). I hope this helps in the discussion! |
This is very helpful to see @sTamaroTum , thank you for sending! We're currently road-mapping are next batch of efforts and will plan to incorporate this. @rafmudaf @christiannvaughn |
@sTamaroTum, I've opened a separate issue to track our intention to implement this approach: Issue #746 |
note development here is now moving to #797 |
Closing as replace by #924 |
SECOND pass computing yaw loss the way discussed with MIke Howland
(Redoing this after merging in the changes for floating cp/ct)
This pull request offers a first very hacky implementation of the method of computing yaw loss from the paper:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-fluid-mechanics/article/modelling-the-induction-thrust-and-power-of-a-yawmisaligned-actuator-disk/3A34FC48A6BC52A78B6D221C13F4FC3A
I add a quick calculation of the "Version 1a" calculation of ct-prime and than power loss, assuming yaw doesn't impact ct-prime. I don't apply the cube so that, as with pP, the calculation can be applied to wind speed and accomodate above rated conditions.
I'm temporarily calling this the MIT method but that is just a place-holder name
Related issue
Issue #624
Impacted areas of the software
Additional supporting information
Most changes to turbine.py, but related changes to floris.py, floris_interface.py, solver.py
Test results, if applicable
Include a small example file examples/18b_test_mit_method.py, which gives the following plot, comparing the yaw loss with assuming default Pp behavior and showing similar behavior