Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update rfc_max_forecast.yml #625

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 16, 2024
Merged

Update rfc_max_forecast.yml #625

merged 5 commits into from
Feb 16, 2024

Conversation

shawncrawley
Copy link
Collaborator

@shawncrawley shawncrawley commented Jan 31, 2024

This change had been left out of my #621 PR on accident. This has already been hard-coded directly on TI to confirm it corrects my issue (so no need for an immediate redeploy). Everything is now working as expected.

This change had been left out of my #621 PR on accident. This has already been hard-coded directly on TI to confirm it corrects my issue (so no need for an immediate redeploy). Everything is now working as expected.
Adds "initial_flood_point" column to publish.rfc_max_forecast table.
Adds attributes for the "initial flood point" (i.e. value, status, and timestep) to service.
Fixes drawing order issue that has existed for a while. The issue was that action was drawing on top with major drawing on bottom. This has now been flipped.
@nickchadwick-noaa nickchadwick-noaa merged commit 2abed0e into ti Feb 16, 2024
1 check passed
@nickchadwick-noaa nickchadwick-noaa deleted the shawncrawley-patch-1 branch February 16, 2024 16:26
nickchadwick-noaa pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2024
This change had been left out of my #621 PR on accident. This has
already been hard-coded directly on TI to confirm it corrects my issue
(so no need for an immediate redeploy). Everything is now working as
expected.
@nickchadwick-noaa nickchadwick-noaa added this to the V2.1.5 milestone Feb 23, 2024
@nickchadwick-noaa nickchadwick-noaa linked an issue Feb 23, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add Flow-Only Gauges to rfc_max_stage
2 participants