Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

removed no-range-check flag for gfortran #658

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 7, 2024
Merged

Conversation

edwardhartnett
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #657


call gf_free(gfld)
end subroutine getgb2p2
! subroutine getgb2p2(lugb, lugi, j, jdisc, jids, jpdtn, jpdt, jgdtn, jgdt, &
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I commented this code out to eliminate a warning, but will be using it in a future PR later today or tomorrow...

@edwardhartnett
Copy link
Contributor Author

@AlexanderRichert-NOAA orr @AlysonStahl-NOAA or @Hang-Lei-NOAA please review...

Copy link
Contributor

@Hang-Lei-NOAA Hang-Lei-NOAA left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't why this view cannot show the changes closely/together with the original code. Do a diff can help in review the changes.

@edwardhartnett edwardhartnett merged commit ead416e into develop May 7, 2024
54 checks passed
@edwardhartnett edwardhartnett deleted the ejh_3_0506 branch May 7, 2024 01:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Do we need gfortran flag -fno-range-check?
2 participants