Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Event Device Support (
evdev
) #1943Event Device Support (
evdev
) #1943Changes from 24 commits
5c1cb16
87e8aa1
f1caebf
0408775
5243583
a93104b
23b107c
39e69f9
49839ad
68ee2e0
3bfa01c
38b4cd4
2f36718
90de6a4
bd00f05
62171ef
d77a69b
4274e92
a3b328b
3773556
2df6adf
75161b5
51d9915
a181f8c
bc6610c
f807152
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the spirit of run_*.py files, would it make sense to provide this code as a configurator? Or at least as a runable script so users don't have to write the code themselves?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To me this is a 'nice to have' and something to add as an issue for a future pull request once this is merged.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this just a pretty name or actually relevant to access/call the device?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The 'device_name' is relevant as it is used to get the device number (in contrast to the nickname line 2 which is cosmetic).
The docs contain a section how to look it up: https://github.com/MiczFlor/RPi-Jukebox-RFID/blob/49839adb01019cb296d67dc29c06cd9a6af0bc62/documentation/builders/event-devices.md#identifying-the-device_name