Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Recover dropped postgres server update #251

Conversation

paulhaefeli
Copy link

Updating the restore logic so that instead of adding time to the submission timestamp (the dropped time of the server), we subtract it. Presently, if you add time, this results in a server being restored with no databases, because the databases would have already been dropped. This should match the restore time logic we have documented for Azure Database for MySQL.

We are recommending they add time to the dropped time when restoring, instead of subtracting. Corrected document to suggest you subtract time from the drop time, to ensure the server is correctly restored.
Copy link
Contributor

@paulhaefeli : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit ea7b506:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
articles/postgresql/flexible-server/how-to-restore-dropped-server.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

For any questions, please:

@v-dirichards
Copy link
Contributor

@kabharati

Can you review the proposed changes?

Important: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@prmerger-automator prmerger-automator bot added the aq-pr-triaged C+L Pull Request Review Team label label Mar 20, 2025
@paulhaefeli paulhaefeli closed this Apr 2, 2025
@paulhaefeli paulhaefeli deleted the recover-dropped-postgres-server-update branch April 2, 2025 20:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants