Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move scripts/code_style.py to the framework #100

Merged
merged 73 commits into from
Dec 18, 2024

Conversation

eleuzi01
Copy link
Contributor

@eleuzi01 eleuzi01 commented Dec 10, 2024

Resolves #70

Development: Mbed-TLS/mbedtls#9836
3.6: Mbed-TLS/mbedtls#9837

solardiz and others added 29 commits November 30, 2024 04:43
Signed-off-by: Elena Uziunaite <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Elena Uziunaite <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Elena Uziunaite <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Elena Uziunaite <[email protected]>
Uniformly return PSA_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED if given an algorithm that includes
a hash, but that hash algorithm is not supported. This will make it easier
to have a uniform treatment of unsupported hashes in automatically generated
tests.

Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <[email protected]>
Allow imports of an ECC public key on an unsupported curve to return
INVALID_ARGUMENT rather than NOT_SUPPORTED. This can happen in our library
code in edge cases when only certain curve families are supported, and it's
acceptable.

The new code does not trigger yet, but it will be useful for a future commit
"Do run not-supported test cases on not-implemented mechanisms"
(forward port of 995d7d4c15406b0a115cadf3f5ec69becafdf20f).

Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <[email protected]>
Following "PSA sign/verify: more uniform error on an unsupported hash", some
error cases are detected earlier, so there is some sloppiness in test case
dependencies that is not longer acceptable.

* In test_suite_psa_crypto, one test case for a hash+sign algorithm now
  returns NOT_SUPPORTED rather than INVALID_ARGUMENT when the hash is not
  supported and the key is invalid.
* In test_suite_psa_crypto_se_driver_hal_mocks, some test cases now error
  out before reaching the mocks rather than after when they attempt to
  use an unsupported hash.

Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <[email protected]>
ECDSA has two variants: deterministic (PSA_ALG_DETERMINISTIC_ECDSA) and
randomized (PSA_ALG_ECDSA). The two variants are different for signature but
identical for verification. Mbed TLS accepts either variant as the algorithm
parameter for verification even when only the other variant is supported,
so we need to handle this as a special case when generating not-supported
test cases.

In this commit:

* Add manually written not-supported test cases for the signature
  operation when exactly one variant is supported.
* Add manually written positive test cases for the verification
  operation when exactly one variant is supported.
* Register that !ECDSA but DETERMINISTIC_ECDSA is not tested yet
  (Mbed-TLS/mbedtls#9592).

A commit in the framework will take care of automatically generated test cases.

Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <[email protected]>
In particular, if interruptible ECDSA is supported but not the deterministic
variant, detect this in psa_sign_hash_start(), whereas before start() would
succeed and psa_sign_hash_complete() would fail. This avoids an
inconsistency between psa_sign_hash() and psa_sign_hash_start() that would
be annoying to handle in test_suite_psa_crypto_op_fail.

Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <[email protected]>
For ECDSA verification, there is no difference between the deterministic and
randomized algorithm. The PSA core consider the two variants as identical as
far as key policies are concerned, and the built-in implementation accepts
either variant even if only the other variant is supported for signature.

In p256-m, accept to perform an ECDSA verification when the algorithm is
specified as deterministic ECDSA. This makes the behavior identical to the
built-in implementation, which is less surprising for users and saves us
from having to cope with a difference in our testing.

Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <[email protected]>
Key type must be a key pair or public-key if not we return
PSA_ERROR_INVALID_ARGUMENT.

The key type must be ECC key as this is what we support for
now otherwise we return PSA_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED.

Signed-off-by: Waleed Elmelegy <[email protected]>
The test is marked as opaque but the parameter was set
to PSA_KEY_LIFETIME_VOLATILE.

Signed-off-by: Waleed Elmelegy <[email protected]>
Rename it to mbedtls_psa_export_public_key_iop_t as
iop stands for "interuptible operation" already.

Signed-off-by: Waleed Elmelegy <[email protected]>
The test is supposed to be an opaque key test but the
testing function does not support specifying an
opaque driver.

Signed-off-by: Waleed Elmelegy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Elena Uziunaite <[email protected]>
* Improve wording of comments.
* Zeroize buffer before doing iop testing to
  avoid comparing with previous values in
  case they are not overwritten.
* Remove redundant testing.

Signed-off-by: Waleed Elmelegy <[email protected]>
Move scripts used by all-core.sh to the framework
@eleuzi01 eleuzi01 added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 10, 2024
@ronald-cron-arm ronald-cron-arm removed the needs-reviewer This PR needs someone to pick it up for review label Dec 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@minosgalanakis minosgalanakis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

The failure is caused by ./tests/scripts/all.sh --seed 4 --keep-going check_python_files
Which is failing into the multibranch PR because of Duplicate module named "code_style" (also at "framework/scripts/code_style.py")

This is a false positive and expected as we are moving things around.

@ronald-cron-arm ronald-cron-arm merged commit 7e6a3d2 into Mbed-TLS:main Dec 18, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request needs-review Every commit must be reviewed by at least two team members, priority-high High priority - will be reviewed soon size-s Estimated task size: small (~2d)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Move scripts/code_style.py to the framework
10 participants