Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

MDEV-35430: Add cast to semi-sync wait skip msg #3748

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 10.6
Choose a base branch
from
Open

MDEV-35430: Add cast to semi-sync wait skip msg #3748

wants to merge 1 commit into from
+2 −2

Conversation

ParadoxV5
Copy link
Contributor

@ParadoxV5 ParadoxV5 commented Jan 10, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Release Notes & How can this PR be tested?

N/A? – This only impacts Big-Endian CPUs.
So just #3360.

PR quality check

  • This is a new feature or a refactoring, and the PR is based against the main branch.
  • This is a bug fix, and the PR is based against the earliest maintained branch in which the bug can be reproduced.
  • I checked the CODING_STANDARDS.md file and my PR conforms to this where appropriate.
  • For any trivial modifications to the PR, I am ok with the reviewer making the changes themselves.

@ParadoxV5 ParadoxV5 changed the title MDEV-35431: Add cast to semi-sync wait skip msg MDEV-35430: Add cast to semi-sync wait skip msg Jan 10, 2025
@ParadoxV5 ParadoxV5 mentioned this pull request Jan 10, 2025
Open
4 tasks
ParadoxV5 added a commit to ParadoxV5/MariaDB-server that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2025
@ParadoxV5
Temporarily cherry-pick from new fixup PRs
f978c6e 
* MariaDB#3746
* MariaDB#3747
* MariaDB#3748
* MariaDB#3749

This commit should not be merged, but skipping it before the
above PRs merge to the `main` branch will brick CIs on `main`.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@bnestere bnestere

Labels
MariaDB Corporation
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@ParadoxV5 @bnestere