Rpm galera

[grooverdan]

previously only Deb builds contained the latest galera package.

Include RPM based distros now.

[grooverdan]

currently no alma/rocky aarch64 galera builds. Fix or omit?

[RazvanLiviuVarzaru]

From this change I think that currently only fedora:39 image will benefit from using the latest-galera as the galera_MTR list does not include the other distros.

builders_galera_mtr = [
"aarch64-debian-12",
"amd64-fedora-39",
"s390x-ubuntu-2004",
"s390x-ubuntu-2204",
"ppc64le-ubuntu-2004",
"ppc64le-ubuntu-2204",
"amd64-freebsd-14",
]

Shoud we plan to extend this list?

[RazvanLiviuVarzaru]

currently no alma/rocky aarch64 galera builds. Fix or omit?

I see that there are some aarch64 - almalinux gal-* builders but they never had the chance to push a package to CI.
I think we should first solve that.

For Rocky, I won't know why we don't build galera pkgs, It wasn't a requirment or did we miss it?

[grooverdan]

galera sles/opensuse will be fixed by MariaDB/galera#18

[grooverdan]

currently no alma/rocky aarch64 galera builds. Fix or omit?

I see that there are some aarch64 - almalinux gal-* builders but they never had the chance to push a package to CI. I think we should first solve that.

For Rocky, I won't know why we don't build galera pkgs, It wasn't a requirment or did we miss it?

Rocky we tend to pull the RHEL images - I paritally covered it but I don't think its a real requirement.

[grooverdan]

merged. There was some PIP errors on sles/opensuse15 that seem unrelated. fc39 was pulling the latest galera-4 package. centos-stream9 had some tls errors on the epel repo that I'm hoping will resolve if it hits a different mirror.

For the moment - need the updated galera-4 to test against the server so appoligies for pushing this though a bit quick.