Updated the package babel/core

[amalvijayan03]

Fix for the issue : GHSA-67hx-6x53-jw92
A security vulnerability was reported with the babel/traverse package, which we aren't using directly. As a workaround, we've updated the babel/core package, which will now include the latest version of babel/traverse.

[miq-bot]

Checked commit amalvijayan03@3b14668 with ruby 2.6.10, rubocop 1.28.2, haml-lint 0.35.0, and yamllint
0 files checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. 🏆

[jeffibm]

Hey @amalvijayan03 , the snapshots appeared and git hub actions seems to have passed all checks now.

Can you do a random testing with the browser console opened? Check for any issues with forms that have drop-down boxes.

[jeffibm]

Hey @amalvijayan03 , once the testing is done, please remove the WIP from the PR title.

[amalvijayan03]

Tested the changes in local has not affected the overall functionality

[jrafanie]

Can we describe why we're updating these packages? Also, is it safe to backport to quinteros?

EDIT: When we look at this in the future, it would be good to know what issue this solves.

[jeffibm]

Can we describe why we're updating these packages? Also, is it safe to backport to quinteros?

EDIT: When we look at this in the future, it would be good to know what issue this solves.

@amalvijayan03 , could you please update the description.

[amalvijayan03]

Can we describe why we're updating these packages? Also, is it safe to backport to quinteros?

EDIT: When we look at this in the future, it would be good to know what issue this solves.

I have updated the issue details in the description. Certainly, we can backport to Quinteros.
If this suffices, may we proceed with the merge?

[jrafanie]

Thanks! LGTM

[jrafanie]

@jeffibm is this for backport? Please set backport if so.