Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BENCH: fix time_geometric_selections #4360

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2023

Conversation

tylerjereddy
Copy link
Member

@tylerjereddy tylerjereddy commented Dec 10, 2023

  • Fixes Benchmarks expect flags #3519

  • There is no good reason to keep the flags in the benchmark--this benchmark has been broken for over a year so we should just use the appropriate kwargs where possible and leave a TODO comment for core flags that we don't have a substitute for

  • better to have this running than hard failing all the time, even if we've lost one of the parametrization dimensions

  • if someone comes along with the confidence to say we can delete the TODO comment, then we can also delete some of the extra parametrization complexity of course

[skip cirrus]


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://mdanalysis--4360.org.readthedocs.build/en/4360/

* Fixes MDAnalysisgh-3519

* There is no good reason to keep the flags in the
benchmark--this benchmark has been broken for over a year
so we should just use the appropriate kwargs where possible
and leave a `TODO` comment for core flags that we don't
have a substitute for

* better to have this running than hard failing all the time,
even if we've lost one of the parametrization dimensions

* if someone comes along with the confidence to say we
can delete the `TODO` comment, then we can also delete
some of the extra parametrization complexity of course

[skip cirrus]
@tylerjereddy tylerjereddy added the benchmarks performance benchmarking with ASV label Dec 10, 2023
Copy link

Linter Bot Results:

Hi @tylerjereddy! Thanks for making this PR. We linted your code and found the following:

There are currently no issues detected! 🎉

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 10, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (37d8fee) 93.37% compared to head (b6bb43d) 93.37%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #4360     +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage    93.37%   93.37%             
==========================================
  Files          170      184     +14     
  Lines        22340    23453   +1113     
  Branches      4085     4085             
==========================================
+ Hits         20859    21899   +1040     
- Misses         963     1036     +73     
  Partials       518      518             

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@RMeli RMeli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds reasonable to me.

Copy link
Member

@hmacdope hmacdope left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@RMeli RMeli merged commit 51e45be into MDAnalysis:develop Dec 11, 2023
25 checks passed
@tylerjereddy tylerjereddy deleted the treddy_issue_3519 branch December 11, 2023 16:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
benchmarks performance benchmarking with ASV performance
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Benchmarks expect flags
3 participants