-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Type check for kwargs #22
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #22 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 96.52% 96.47% -0.05%
==========================================
Files 4 4
Lines 144 142 -2
==========================================
- Hits 139 137 -2
Misses 5 5 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
ext/WeightInitializersCUDAExt.jl
Outdated
@@ -38,6 +39,7 @@ end | |||
|
|||
function identity_init(rng::AbstractCuRNG, ::Type{T}, dims::Integer...; | |||
gain::Number=1, shift::Integer=0) where {T <: Number} | |||
gain = gain isa T ? gain : convert(T, gain) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think you need to check for this. The compiler is smart enough to get rid of these
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we also get rid of this then?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the T(gain)
specifically
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sorry scratch that, I misunderstood
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I meant gain isa T ? gain : convert(T, gain)
can be written as T(gain)
and the compiler should be smart to remove it if the types match.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah I see, should I take that approach with all of the checks?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes
There is some eyntax error, probably |
true, I forgot to fix the |
Addresses #21